research by brycewang-stanford
中国农村经济文献综述（cre-literature-review） brycewang-stanford/cre-literature-review
Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a 《中国农村经济》 manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical 三农 theory references are missing. 本技能服务于《中国农村经济》(China Rural Economy, CRE)。
What it changes View full report → Passed 20 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 15 of 23 without it.
Without skill 65%
With skill 87%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed and 8 more in the full report
8 fixed12 passed either way0 still failing3 broke
Pass-rate lift +22 pp
Tokens +42%
Agent turns 0%
Response time -4% Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/31/2026 v1 20 of 23 cases passed with skill
Use this skill Claude Code DecimalAI agent CLI & files
Save it into your project's skills folder. Claude Code picks it up in its next session.
curl -fsSL --create-dirs -o .claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-cre-literature-review/SKILL.md https://app.decimal.ai/s/brycewang-stanford-cre-literature-review/SKILL.md Copy command Copy SKILL.md
Want it pinned and updatable? pip install "decimalai>=0.15", then decimalai skills add brycewang-stanford-cre-literature-review, and start Claude Code with claude --plugin-dir "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.agents"
Linked stays up to date: your agents get the author's new versions automatically.
Editable copy is yours to change; the author's updates won't reach it.
Install linked skill Create editable copy
1 · One-time — install the CLI (
docs ↗ )
$ pip install "decimalai>=0.15"Copy
2 · Get the skill — writes .agents/skills/brycewang-stanford-cre-literature-review/ and pins it in .decimal/skills.lock
$ decimalai skills add brycewang-stanford-cre-literature-reviewCopy
Copy link Copy README badge Copy SKILL.md No CLI? Get the same file — curl · raw file $ curl -fsSL --create-dirs -o .claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-cre-literature-review/SKILL.md https://app.decimal.ai/s/brycewang-stanford-cre-literature-review/SKILL.mdCopy
Safety checks: 3 of 3 passed
Code scan Clean Intent Passed Content Clean
Overview Benchmark Contents Activity Versions 1 Ratings 0
See it in action One of 8 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Prompt 请对以下文献综述草稿概要进行严格指标计算并按规范格式输出诊断：总文献50篇；中文25篇、英文25篇；纯理论文献12篇；近五年文献22篇；包含国内农经顶刊引用但未与近三年《中国农村经济》及《中国农村观察》同主题论文对话。结构包含了理论层、实证层和本文位置三层。请直接输出标准化诊断结果。
What was checked, without and with the skill Checked Without skill With skill The response outputs the standard diagnostic text block with 3-layer structure and calculated metrics. The response lists missing comparison with recent articles in Chinese Rural Economy and Chinese Rural Observation in the missing checklist. The response designates cre-identification in the next step field.
Show both answers
What's inside The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md 93 lines single file
中国农村经济文献综述（cre-literature-review）
触发时机
综述缺三农领域中文经典，或全部是英文文献
综述缺理论文献 （农户行为、土地制度、契约组织等理论根基）
综述写成了"罗列式"而非"对话式"
结构规范
《中国农村经济》偏好三层结构 的综述：
第一层：理论文献 （中外并重）——建立问题的理论坐标（如农户行为理论、诱致性制度变迁、契约理论、发展经济学）第二层：三农领域实证文献 （中文为主、英文为辅）——梳理已有的农村微观实证发现第三层：本文位置 ——明确指出"本文与现有研究的差异"，尤其是相对于本刊与姊妹刊《中国农村观察》近年同主题文章的差异
与综合经济学期刊综述的差异
《中国农村经济》尤其看重三农领域文献是否到位 ：既要有国际理论与方法文献，也要充分对话国内农经学界的权威研究。一篇只引国际顶刊、不引国内农经经典的稿件，会被审稿人认为"未扎根本土文献"。
中外文献配比
经验法则（具体不必拘泥，导向是"中外并重 + 理论扎实"）：
总引文 40–80 条（投稿前请到官网"投稿须知"核对当年参考文献条数上限）
中文文献占比 40%–60% （三农领域本土实证不能缺位）
理论文献占比 ≥ 20% （理论推导 / 综述，不是实证应用）五年内文献占比 ≥ 40%
既覆盖国际顶刊（AJAE / AER / JDE / Food Policy 等），也覆盖国内权威（《经济研究》《管理世界》《中国农村经济》《中国农村观察》《农业经济问题》等）
必引避坑清单
综述句式模板
Track record Benchmark 20 / 23
test cases passed, vs 15 / 23 without
Adoption
Users 2
Times used 22 View activity → Safety and source details
SkillSafety ✓ 3 of 3 passed ✓ Code scan 15 of 15 checks clean
0 critical · 0 warning · 0 info — scanner v4 — 8/10/2026
View 15 scanner checks live_secret remote_code_execution reverse_shell data_exfiltration ssrf_metadata agent_snooping anti_refusal destructive_commands obfuscated_unicode unicode_homoglyph opaque_blob suspicious_url tool_overreach trigger_abuse prompt_injection_phrasing
✓ Intent Safe
LLM judge · does the skill do what it claims
✓ Content Clean
LLM judge · policy & harmful-content review
Source Imported brycewang-stanford / awesome-journal-skills
China-Rural-Economy-Skills/skills/cre-literature-review/SKILL.md
View on GitHub ↗ License MITImported 8/10/2026Version v1