Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →AI-driven multi-agent research assistant for end-to-end studies
.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-datagen-research-guide/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 18% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 10% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 17% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 16% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 0% | 0% |
A skill for orchestrating AI-driven multi-agent research workflows that handle literature review, hypothesis generation, experiment design, data analysis, and report writing. Based on the DATAGEN project (2K stars), this skill provides structured guidance on building automated research pipelines using collaborative agent architectures.
Modern research increasingly benefits from AI assistance at every stage. DATAGEN's approach uses multiple specialized agents that collaborate on a research task, each handling a different aspect of the workflow. This skill teaches the agent how to coordinate such multi-agent pipelines, ensuring quality control at each handoff point and maintaining scientific rigor throughout.
The multi-agent paradigm is particularly powerful for research tasks that span multiple competencies: a literature agent gathers relevant prior work, a methodology agent designs appropriate experiments, a data agent handles collection and cleaning, an analysis agent runs statistical tests, and a writing agent produces publication-ready text.
The research pipeline employs these specialized agent roles:
Literature Agent
Hypothesis Agent
Experiment Agent
Analysis Agent
Writing Agent
Coordinating multiple agents requires careful orchestration:
Task Decomposition
Quality Control
Error Recovery
The DATAGEN approach excels at synthetic data generation for research:
This skill adapts to multiple research contexts:
Social Sciences - Survey design, factor analysis, structural equation modeling Natural Sciences - Experimental protocols, measurement validation, replication studies Computer Science - Benchmark design, ablation studies, performance evaluation Health Sciences - Clinical trial design, meta-analysis, systematic reviews Engineering - Design of experiments, optimization, reliability testing
This skill coordinates with other Research-Claw capabilities:
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 52,477 | 53,914 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,265 | 8,441 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 53,274 | 33,044 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 8,251 | 7,167 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 13,942 | 10,583 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,281 | 2,688 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 19,315 | 12,535 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,796 | 3,069 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 6,555 | 2,230 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,159 | 1,405 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 8,352 | 2,678 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,227 | 1,524 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 8,557 | 3,060 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,320 | 1,546 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 20,522 | 20,491 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,837 | 3,863 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 17,789 | 13,021 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,454 | 2,852 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 12,135 | 6,860 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,977 | 1,835 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 14,009 | 3,187 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,837 | 1,560 | -15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 14,047 | 14,300 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,378 | 3,483 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 11,384 | 10,117 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,685 | 2,404 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 20,725 | 22,085 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,415 | 4,448 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 10,265 | 2,169 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,419 | 1,421 | +0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 20,347 | 11,039 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,059 | 2,654 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 11,957 | 4,151 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,811 | 1,751 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 17,765 | 14,398 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,734 | 3,350 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 18,103 | 14,108 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,630 | 3,184 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 23,314 | 15,045 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,266 | 3,370 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 9,362 | 13,101 | +40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,982 | 3,621 | +83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 16,575 | 23,362 | +41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,873 | 4,399 | +53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | 15,532 | 19,957 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,346 | 4,046 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +26 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.