Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Introduction to literature search & review skills - systematic paper finding, screening, extraction, and citation traversal
.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-getting-started-with-research-superpowers/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 10% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 10% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 25% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -28% | 0% |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 30% | 0% |
<!-- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ 本文件为开源 Skill 原始文档,收录仅供学习与研究参考 ║ ║ CoPaper.AI 收集整理 | https://copaper.ai ║ ╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
来源仓库: https://github.com/kthorn/research-superpower 项目名称: research-superpower 开源协议: MIT License 收录日期: 2026-04-02
声明: 本文件版权归原作者所有。此处收录旨在为社会科学实证研究者 提供 AI Agent Skills 的集中参考。如有侵权,请联系删除。 -->
Research Superpowers gives Claude Code systematic workflows for literature searching and review.
Focus: Finding, screening, and extracting data from published papers. NOT for analyzing experimental data or designing experiments.
Use these skills for systematic literature reviews:
Literature Search & Review Skills (skills/research/)
When user asks a literature search question:
Each query creates a folder in research-sessions/:
research-sessions/YYYY-MM-DD-query-description/
├── SUMMARY.md # Main findings
├── papers-reviewed.json # Deduplication tracking (DOI → status)
├── papers/ # Downloaded PDFs and supplementary data
└── citations/ # Citation graph trackingFor systematic literature review:
PubMed E-utilities (no key required):
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgihttps://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esummary.fcgihttps://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgiSemantic Scholar (free tier works, optional key for higher limits):
https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/DOI:{doi}https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/{id}/referenceshttps://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/{id}/citationsUse the find-skills script to search for relevant skills:
bash# From project directory ./scripts/find-skills # List all skills ./scripts/find-skills literature # Search for "literature" ./scripts/find-skills 'cite|ref' # Regex search
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 25,272 | 3,004 | -88% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,290 | 1,463 | -72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 11,309 | 5,517 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,341 | 2,360 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 26,918 | 4,956 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,209 | 1,597 | -74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 5,466 | 2,928 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,240 | 1,908 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 3,656 | 1,980 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 811 | 1,671 | +106% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 5,156 | 2,249 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,067 | 1,765 | +65% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 6,270 | 2,463 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,438 | 1,770 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 12,745 | 22,831 | +79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,779 | 6,400 | +130% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 3,316 | 1,584 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 738 | 1,555 | +111% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 4,177 | 2,759 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 907 | 1,843 | +103% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 11,104 | 1,564 | -86% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,189 | 1,538 | -30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 8,973 | 1,614 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,824 | 1,501 | -18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 8,695 | 1,762 | -80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,368 | 1,504 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 7,634 | 1,654 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,446 | 1,590 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 6,723 | 1,186 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,114 | 1,395 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 10,536 | 1,720 | -84% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,082 | 1,500 | -28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 8,357 | 1,705 | -80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,563 | 1,542 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 3,789 | 1,892 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 571 | 1,543 | +170% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 21,822 | 1,620 | -93% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,825 | 1,604 | -12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 6,563 | 1,814 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,215 | 1,582 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 12,992 | 7,292 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,956 | 2,857 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 17,896 | 27,510 | +54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,189 | 1,605 | -62% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +27 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.