Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Conference papers on graph neural networks and graph learning
.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-graph-learning-papers-guide/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 61% | 0% |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 35% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 89% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 44% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 48% | 0% |
A curated list of graph learning papers from top AI/ML conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, KDD, WWW, AAAI). Covers graph neural networks, graph transformers, spectral methods, message passing, and applications in molecular science, social networks, and recommendation systems. Organized by venue, year, and topic for systematic tracking.
Graph Learning
├── Graph Neural Networks
│ ├── Message Passing (GCN, GAT, GraphSAGE, GIN)
│ ├── Spectral (ChebNet, CayleyNet)
│ ├── Graph Transformers (Graphormer, GPS)
│ └── Equivariant GNNs (EGNN, SE(3)-Transformers)
├── Graph Generation
│ ├── VAE-based (GraphVAE)
│ ├── Autoregressive (GraphRNN)
│ ├── Diffusion (GDSS, DiGress)
│ └── Flow-based (GraphFlow)
├── Self-supervised Learning
│ ├── Contrastive (GraphCL, GCA)
│ ├── Generative (GraphMAE)
│ └── Predictive (GPT-GNN)
├── Scalability
│ ├── Sampling (GraphSAINT, ClusterGCN)
│ ├── Knowledge distillation
│ └── Graph condensation
├── Temporal Graphs
│ ├── Dynamic GNNs
│ ├── Temporal interaction
│ └── Evolving graphs
└── Applications
├── Molecular property prediction
├── Drug discovery
├── Social network analysis
├── Recommendation systems
└── Traffic forecasting| Model | Year | Innovation | |-------|------|-----------| | GCN | 2017 | Spectral convolution simplified | | GraphSAGE | 2017 | Inductive with sampling | | GAT | 2018 | Attention over neighbors | | GIN | 2019 | WL-test as powerful as possible | | Graphormer | 2021 | Transformer on graphs | | GPS | 2022 | General, powerful, scalable recipe | | GraphMAE | 2022 | Masked autoencoding on graphs |
pythonimport arxiv def find_gnn_papers(topic="graph neural network", max_results=20): """Find recent GNN papers.""" search = arxiv.Search( query=f"abs:{topic}", max_results=max_results, sort_by=arxiv.SortCriterion.SubmittedDate, ) for r in search.results(): print(f"[{r.published.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')}] {r.title}") find_gnn_papers("graph transformer") find_gnn_papers("molecular graph generation")
pythondatasets = { "Node Classification": { "Cora": "Citation network, 7 classes", "PubMed": "Medical citation, 3 classes", "ogbn-arxiv": "arXiv papers, 40 classes", "ogbn-papers100M": "100M papers (large-scale)", }, "Graph Classification": { "ZINC": "Molecular graphs, regression", "ogbg-molpcba": "128 molecular tasks", "PROTEINS": "Protein function prediction", }, "Link Prediction": { "ogbl-collab": "Author collaborations", "ogbl-citation2": "Citation prediction", }, } for task, ds in datasets.items(): print(f"\n{task}:") for name, desc in ds.items(): print(f" {name}: {desc}")
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 16,820 | 29,902 | +78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,029 | 3,715 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 15,044 | 15,508 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,571 | 3,797 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 21,209 | 16,512 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,757 | 3,823 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→fail | 19,609 | 28,171 | +44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,058 | 5,773 | +89% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 19,934 | 16,194 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,260 | 3,756 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 12,143 | 8,338 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,184 | 2,545 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 19,535 | 20,320 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,171 | 4,401 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 17,367 | 19,495 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,985 | 4,343 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 17,356 | 17,355 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,183 | 4,303 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 18,124 | 21,598 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,132 | 5,038 | +61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 16,535 | 19,488 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,694 | 4,295 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 20,235 | 22,136 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,340 | 4,942 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→fail | 16,062 | 17,806 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,475 | 3,571 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 16,997 | 18,490 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,700 | 4,031 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 5,580 | 4,071 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 939 | 1,655 | +76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 9,391 | 7,738 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,435 | 2,235 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 16,116 | 23,438 | +45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,733 | 5,236 | +92% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 16,808 | 13,545 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,739 | 3,175 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 14,719 | 10,992 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,304 | 2,756 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 12,669 | 10,523 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,066 | 2,780 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 19,510 | 21,719 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,906 | 5,511 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 19,881 | 18,115 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,997 | 4,342 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 12,284 | 12,671 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,219 | 3,084 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of 0 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.