Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Use when targeting 《国际经济评论》(International Economic Review — 中国社会科学院主管、世界经济与政治研究所主办的双月刊, 1993 创刊, CN 11-3799/F) or deciding whether a theory/policy-oriented international-economics manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's review-essay 定位, 顺序编码制 house style, official re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-international-economic-review-cn/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 38% | 0% |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 25% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 19% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 12% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 37% | 0% |
《国际经济评论》由中国社会科学院主管、世界经济与政治研究所主办，是大型双月刊（1993 年创刊，CN 11-3799/F）。栏目以国际经济格局、全球治理、大国经济关系与开放政策的评论型/理论政策分析为主，相对偏重思想深度和对国际形势的解释力，而非纯计量识别。
这个 skill 是定位 / 选刊 / 改写框架工具，不替代该刊最新官方投稿须知。正式投稿前必须重新核对官网、采编系统或编辑部发布的最新模板。
industrial-economics-research（《产业经济研究》） / inquiry-into-economic-issues（《经济问题探索》） / international-economics-and-trade-research（《国际经贸探索》） / issues-in-agricultural-economy（《农业经济问题》）。若这些刊物的读者对象更贴近，不要因为名称、地区或变量相似而强行投本刊。../../resources/source-basis.md 和 ../../resources/official-source-map.md，从其中的官方来源锚点或同一主办/出版体系入口开始核验，并在回答中说明核验日期。严格计量国际经济论文转 journal-of-world-economy；贸易实务问题转 journal-of-international-trade。
text【匹配度】高 / 中 / 低（一句话理由） 【目标期刊】《国际经济评论》 【选题标签】<最贴近的 2-3 个主题> 【方法证据】<当前方法是否够本刊标准> 【最大风险】<最可能导致退稿的一点> 【需核验官方要求】<投稿系统/匿名/摘要/图表/数据等> 【改投建议】<若不匹配，给出更合适期刊>
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-12 | fail→pass | 24,722 | 19,976 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,666 | 3,682 | +38% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 25,193 | 19,383 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,967 | 3,700 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 29,677 | 18,113 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,045 | 3,626 | +19% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 26,444 | 14,451 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,264 | 3,648 | +12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 38,955 | 17,801 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,139 | 4,295 | +37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 47,237 | 17,326 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,522 | 3,384 | -25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 24,043 | 19,262 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,164 | 3,612 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 26,191 | 17,720 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,333 | 3,987 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 22,251 | 19,711 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,114 | 3,646 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 31,965 | 20,714 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,840 | 3,858 | +0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 26,932 | 22,393 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,054 | 4,158 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 21,785 | 12,403 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,444 | 3,279 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 22,967 | 23,355 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,334 | 4,312 | +29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→fail | 19,768 | 21,647 | +10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,047 | 4,159 | +103% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 42,460 | 34,320 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,004 | 6,813 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | 13,049 | 15,052 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,375 | 3,046 | +122% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 28,616 | 21,981 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,437 | 3,932 | +14% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 26,854 | 18,890 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,312 | 3,903 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 22,786 | 20,245 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,753 | 3,829 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 29,513 | 16,731 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,768 | 3,406 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 21,615 | 21,316 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,190 | 3,945 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 13,242 | 13,543 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,002 | 2,890 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→pass | 22,345 | 18,917 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,780 | 3,697 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +57 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.