Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Creates a structured annotation note in references/ with sections for research question, data, findings, and relevance. Use when documenting a paper.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -26% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -60% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -36% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -50% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -44% | 0% |
Create a structured annotation note for a paper in references/.
$ARGUMENTS — a citation key from references.bib, a DOI, or a paper description (e.g., "acemoglu2001colonial" or "Acemoglu 2001 colonial origins")references.bib, use that entry's metadatareferences.bib first (offer to run the /project:cite workflow)references/ named <citation-key>.md with this structure:markdown # <Author (Year)> — <Short Title>
Citation key: <key> Full reference: <formatted reference>
## Research Question
What question does this paper address?]
## Identification Strategy
How do the authors establish causality? What is the main source of variation?]
## Data and Sample
What data do they use? What is the sample period, unit of observation, and sample size?]
## Key Findings
## Methodology Notes
Econometric methods, estimators, robustness checks worth noting]
## Relevance to This Project
How does this paper relate to the current research? What can we build on or contrast with?]
references.bib and cannot be resolved, ask the user for more details.references/<key>.md already exists, show the existing note and ask if the user wants to update it.Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.