Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/paper-excellence
Comprehensive multi-dimensional review of the sewage-house-prices project. Runs econometrics audit, code review, manuscript proofread, and bibliography validation in parallel. Computes a weighted aggregate score. This skill should be used when asked for a "full review", "quality check", "paper excellence", or before submission milestones.
Passed 9 of 18 test cases with the skill, and 4 of 18 without it.
and 5 more in the full report
7 fixed6 passed either way12 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 6 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Where should the bibliography validation agent output its standalone detailed Markdown log report?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Saves the bibliography report to output/log/bib_validation.md. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Run a comprehensive quality assessment of the sewage-house-prices project across all dimensions.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — all for full review, or a specific component.
docs/overleaf/*.tex — Manuscript sectionsscripts/R/09_analysis/ — Analysis scriptsoutput/tables/ — Generated tablesoutput/figures/ — Generated figuresdocs/overleaf/refs.bib — BibliographyLaunch up to 4 agents simultaneously:
Agent 1: Econometrics Audit Review all identification strategies (hedonic, repeat sales, long diff, DiD, upstream/downstream, dry spills). Cross-reference manuscript claims against analysis scripts. Weight: 30%
Agent 2: Code Review
Review all scripts in scripts/R/09_analysis/ for code quality, reproducibility, and project convention compliance.
Weight: 15%
Agent 3: Manuscript Proofread
Review all .tex files for structure, claims-evidence alignment, identification fidelity, writing quality, grammar, and LaTeX compilation.
Weight: 35%
Agent 4: Bibliography Validation
Cross-reference all citations against refs.bib. Check for missing entries, unused references, and quality issues.
Weight: 5%
test cases passed, vs 4 / 18 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.