Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Transform research papers into interactive AI agents for exploration
.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-paper-to-agent-guide/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -1% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 13% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 23% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 45% | 0% |
| case-22 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 44% | 0% |
A skill for transforming published research papers into interactive AI agents that can answer questions, explain methodology, and help replicate findings. Based on Paper2Agent (2K stars), this skill guides the agent through extracting structured knowledge from academic papers and creating conversational interfaces for deep exploration.
Traditional paper reading is linear and passive. Paper-to-Agent converts this into an active, queryable experience. By parsing a paper's structure, extracting key claims, methodology details, and results, the agent becomes an expert on that specific paper, ready to answer follow-up questions, explain complex sections, and connect findings to the broader literature.
This approach is especially valuable for interdisciplinary researchers who need to quickly understand papers outside their primary expertise, for journal clubs seeking deeper discussion, and for students learning to critically evaluate published research.
The agent should follow this structured workflow when converting a paper to an interactive agent:
Step 1: Structure Extraction
Step 2: Claim Extraction
Step 3: Methodology Mapping
Once a paper has been parsed, the agent can support these interaction patterns:
Question-Answering
Critical Analysis
Replication Assistance
The skill supports building knowledge graphs from processed papers:
When multiple papers have been processed, the agent can:
This skill connects with other Research-Claw capabilities:
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-09 | pass→pass | 15,329 | 17,006 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,324 | 3,379 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 13,952 | 14,889 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,488 | 3,576 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | pass→pass | 10,349 | 12,172 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,745 | 1,739 | -0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 6,020 | 6,977 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,028 | 1,781 | +73% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→fail | 14,770 | 8,605 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,079 | 2,339 | +13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 8,017 | 5,758 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,119 | 1,648 | +47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 11,101 | 9,391 | -15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,718 | 2,423 | +41% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 12,702 | 11,506 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,412 | 3,195 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 14,325 | 13,068 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,204 | 2,856 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 10,682 | 9,019 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,461 | 2,093 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 16,271 | 9,654 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,367 | 2,346 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 7,659 | 4,032 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,109 | 1,702 | +53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 15,872 | 14,052 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,460 | 2,835 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 22,856 | 13,159 | -42% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,153 | 2,885 | +34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 21,480 | 16,879 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,329 | 3,506 | +5% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 16,458 | 16,413 | -0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,693 | 3,450 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 11,949 | 11,442 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,057 | 2,666 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→fail | 17,199 | 16,615 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,700 | 3,331 | +23% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 12,784 | 14,168 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,248 | 3,380 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 13,838 | 11,986 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,092 | 2,681 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 16,095 | 15,072 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,509 | 3,308 | +32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | 26,079 | 30,653 | +18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,880 | 6,806 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | 9,813 | 3,699 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,369 | 1,654 | +21% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of -33 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.