Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/post-labor-economics
Post-labor economies with automation, UBI, and wealth distribution
Passed 21 of 24 test cases with the skill, and 19 of 24 without it.
2 fixed19 passed either way3 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 2 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
What is the core structure of a stakeholder fund proposal for post-labor distribution, and which policy researchers or institutions advocate for national AI dividend funds?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The proposal defines a social wealth fund or state-owned AI fund that distributes citizen dividends. | Passed | Passed |
| The analysis names Matt Bruenig or Seth Stern as advocates for stakeholder or social wealth funds. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Post-labor economics studies the economic consequences of advanced automation -- the possibility that AI and robotics will displace human labor at a scale and speed that overwhelms traditional adjustment mechanisms. While technological unemployment is an old concern (dating to the Luddites and Keynes's "Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren"), the current wave of AI capabilities has made the question urgent: what happens to labor markets, income distribution, and economic growth when machines can perform most cognitive and physical tasks?
This is not science fiction. The academic literature on task displacement, skill-biased technological change, and automation risk has produced substantial empirical findings and theoretical frameworks. Researchers from economics, political science, sociology, and computer science are converging on these questions.
This guide covers the key theoretical models, empirical evidence, policy proposals (UBI, robot taxes, stakeholder funds), and methodological approaches for studying the economics of automation. It is designed for researchers entering this rapidly growing field and for those in adjacent disciplines who need to engage with the economic arguments.
The canonical model (Acemoglu & Restrepo, 2018, 2019) decomposes production into tasks rather than jobs:
Production = f(Tasks performed by Labor, Tasks performed by Capital)
Key dynamics:
1. DISPLACEMENT EFFECT
- Machines replace humans in existing tasks
- Reduces labor demand, depresses wages
- Concentrated in routine cognitive and manual tasks
2. PRODUCTIVITY EFFECT
- Automation lowers costs, increases output
- Some gains flow to workers via cheaper goods
- But distribution depends on market structure
3. REINSTATEMENT EFFECT
- New tasks created that require human comparative advantage
- Historically: ATMs → bank branch expansion → more tellers (temporarily)
- Question: Is this time different? Will new tasks emerge fast enough?
4. NET EFFECT
- Historical pattern: displacement < reinstatement (net job growth)
- Current concern: AI attacks both routine AND non-routine tasks
- Speed of displacement may exceed speed of reinstatement
test cases passed, vs 19 / 24 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.