Generate academic referee reports for economics/finance papers, followed by a 150-word letter to the editor with recommendation (Reject / Major Revision) and Kai Wu signature. Two modes (normal / high-level), configurable number of comments; recommendation choice drives evaluation tone (Reject → negative, Major Revision → neutral).
SkillScore70Maintained
Automatic
◆Research pack
Last verified 8/7/2026
What it changes
Passed 13 of 19 test cases with the skill, and 4 of 19 without it.
Without skill22%
With skill70%
Checks it passed that the model alone missed
Names the output review document main-review.doc.
Targets 300 words for Comment 2 in high-level mode.
Names the review file JFE-2025-0891_Final-review.doc.
and 11 more in the full report
12 fixed4 passed either way6 still failing1 broke
Pass-rate lift
+48 pp
Tokens
+179%
Agent turns
0%
Response time
-49%
Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/7/2026v116 of 23 cases passed with skill · 19 comparable
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
See it in action
One of 12 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
1 of 12
Prompt
In Part 4 of the report, what is the target word count for the body of the Letter to the Editor?
What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked
Without skill
With skill
Targets 150 English words for the Letter to the Editor.
Missed
Passed
case-23 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/7/2026 · answers are capped and redacted
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md250 linessingle file
Referee Report Generator
Overview
This skill generates a referee report for an academic economics/finance paper. The user provides a project folder containing the manuscript and supporting files. The skill reads the paper thoroughly, then generates a structured referee report with a summary, overall assessment, and numbered specific comments.
Input: A project folder containing:
main.tex (or *.pdf) — the manuscript
Subfolders with tables/figures (.tex files referenced by the manuscript)
Output: {original-filename}-review.doc saved in the project folder (e.g., if the manuscript is RAEL-2026-0427_Proof_hi.pdf, the output is RAEL-2026-0427_Proof_hi-review.doc)
Language Rule
Communicate with the user in Chinese (questions, status updates, confirmations).
Write the referee report entirely in English (summary, assessment, all comments).
Workflow
Phase 1: Initialization
Receive folder path from user (via $ARGUMENTS or ask: "请提供论文项目文件夹路径").
Scan the folder using Glob:
Locate the manuscript: main.tex, or *.pdf.
Locate all .tex files in subfolders (tables/figures).
Read the manuscript in full. If it is a PDF, use the Read tool with page ranges for large files.
Read all table and figure .tex files from subfolders so you have full knowledge of the paper's empirical results, variable definitions, and sample characteristics.
Phase 2: Configuration
Use one AskUserQuestion call with three questions:
Question 1 — Recommendation (推荐意见):
Reject: Paper has fundamental weaknesses. → Evaluation tone is negative.
Major Revision: Paper has merit but needs significant improvement. → Evaluation tone is neutral.