Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/research-paper-writer
Guide for writing formal academic papers following IEEE and ACM standards
Passed 17 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 12 of 22 without it.
and 4 more in the full report
5 fixed12 passed either way5 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 5 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
I am writing a paper for an ACM CS conference and am structuring my section layout. My co-author suggested putting 'Threats to Validity' as a subsection inside Evaluation, and omitting the Computing Classification System since keywords are enough. How should the top-level section structure and classification metadata be configured for ACM standard layout?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Places the ACM Computing Classification System concepts prior to the keywords. | Passed | Passed |
| Positions Threats to Validity as an independent top-level numbered section following Discussion and preceding Conclusion. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
This skill guides the creation of formal academic papers for computer science and engineering venues, with a focus on IEEE and ACM formatting standards. It covers manuscript structure, citation practices, figure/table conventions, and submission preparation. Applicable to conference papers (6-10 pages), journal articles (12-20 pages), and workshop papers (4-6 pages).
Title
Authors (Name, Affiliation, Email)
Abstract (150-250 words)
Index Terms (4-6 keywords)
I. INTRODUCTION
II. RELATED WORK
III. METHODOLOGY / PROPOSED APPROACH
IV. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
VI. CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
Title
Authors (Name, Affiliation, Email, ORCID)
Abstract (150-250 words)
CCS Concepts (from ACM Computing Classification System)
Keywords (3-6 terms)
1 INTRODUCTION
2 BACKGROUND AND RELATED WORK
3 APPROACH / METHOD
4 EVALUATION
5 RESULTS
test cases passed, vs 12 / 22 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.