Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →R&R cycle — classify referee comments and route to appropriate agents. Replaces /respond-to-referee.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -15% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 5% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 9% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -7% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -47% | 0% |
Structure point-by-point referee responses with classification, agent routing per revision protocol, and diplomatic drafting.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — path to referee report file(s), optionally followed by paper path.
$ARGUMENTS| Class | Routing | Action | |-------|---------|--------| | NEW ANALYSIS | → Coder agent | Flag for user, create analysis task | | CLARIFICATION | → Writer agent | Draft rewritten section | | REWRITE | → Writer agent | Draft structural revision | | DISAGREE | → User (mandatory) | Draft diplomatic pushback, flag for review | | MINOR | → Writer agent | Draft fix directly |
Save to quality_reports/referee_response_tracker.md with:
Generate LaTeX response letter with:
When DISAGREE: open with acknowledgment, provide evidence, offer partial concession, NEVER say "the referee is wrong." FLAG for user review.
quality_reports/referee_response_tracker.mdquality_reports/referee_response_[journal]_[date].texpaper/sections/ (for CLARIFICATION/REWRITE items)Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.