Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →brycewang-stanford/revise
R&R cycle — classify referee comments and route to appropriate agents. Replaces /respond-to-referee.
Passed 11 of 18 test cases with the skill, and 7 of 18 without it.
and 8 more in the full report
7 fixed7 passed either way7 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 7 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
In our revision tracking file, under what category or priority status are DISAGREE items grouped?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Groups DISAGREE items under FLAGGED | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Structure point-by-point referee responses with classification, agent routing per revision protocol, and diplomatic drafting.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — path to referee report file(s), optionally followed by paper path.
$ARGUMENTS| Class | Routing | Action |
|---|---|---|
| NEW ANALYSIS | → Coder agent | Flag for user, create analysis task |
| CLARIFICATION | → Writer agent | Draft rewritten section |
| REWRITE | → Writer agent | Draft structural revision |
| DISAGREE | → User (mandatory) | Draft diplomatic pushback, flag for review |
| MINOR | → Writer agent | Draft fix directly |
Save to quality_reports/referee_response_tracker.md with:
Generate LaTeX response letter with:
test cases passed, vs 7 / 18 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.