Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Paper discovery via recommendation APIs (OpenAlex, CrossRef citation networks)
.claude/skills/brycewang-stanford-semantic-scholar-recs-guide/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -13% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 2% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | -3% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 229% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 141% | 0% |
Leverage the OpenAlex and CrossRef APIs to discover related papers, traverse citation networks, and build comprehensive reading lists programmatically.
OpenAlex indexes over 250 million academic works and provides a free, no-key-required API that supports:
Base URL: https://api.openalex.org CrossRef URL: https://api.crossref.org
Use OpenAlex's concept graph and citation data to discover related work from seed papers.
pythonimport requests HEADERS = {"User-Agent": "ResearchPlugins/1.0 (https://wentor.ai)"} WORK_ID = "W2741809807" # OpenAlex work ID # Get the seed paper's concepts response = requests.get( f"https://api.openalex.org/works/{WORK_ID}", headers=HEADERS ) paper = response.json() concepts = [c["id"] for c in paper.get("concepts", [])[:3]] # Find works sharing the same concepts, sorted by citations for concept_id in concepts: related = requests.get( "https://api.openalex.org/works", params={"filter": f"concepts.id:{concept_id}", "sort": "cited_by_count:desc", "per_page": 10}, headers=HEADERS ) for w in related.json().get("results", []): print(f"[{w.get('publication_year')}] {w.get('title')} (citations: {w.get('cited_by_count')})")
pythonimport requests def search_crossref(query, limit=10, sort="is-referenced-by-count"): """Search CrossRef for papers sorted by citation count.""" resp = requests.get( "https://api.crossref.org/works", params={"query": query, "rows": limit, "sort": sort, "order": "desc"}, headers={"User-Agent": "ResearchPlugins/1.0 (https://wentor.ai; mailto:dev@wentor.ai)"} ) return resp.json().get("message", {}).get("items", []) results = search_crossref("transformer attention mechanism") for w in results: title = w.get("title", [""])[0] if w.get("title") else "" print(f" {title} — Cited by: {w.get('is-referenced-by-count', 0)}")
Walk the citation graph to discover foundational and derivative works.
pythonwork_id = "W2741809807" response = requests.get( "https://api.openalex.org/works", params={ "filter": f"cites:{work_id}", "sort": "cited_by_count:desc", "per_page": 20 }, headers=HEADERS ) for w in response.json().get("results", []): print(f" [{w.get('publication_year')}] {w.get('title')} ({w.get('cited_by_count')} cites)")
pythonresponse = requests.get( f"https://api.openalex.org/works/{work_id}", headers=HEADERS ) paper = response.json() ref_ids = paper.get("referenced_works", []) # Fetch details for referenced works for ref_id in ref_ids[:20]: ref = requests.get(f"https://api.openalex.org/works/{ref_id.split('/')[-1]}", headers=HEADERS).json() print(f" [{ref.get('publication_year')}] {ref.get('title')} ({ref.get('cited_by_count')} cites)")
Combine search, concept discovery, and citation traversal into a discovery pipeline:
| Step | Method | Purpose | |------|--------|---------| | 1. Seed selection | Manual or keyword search | Identify 3-5 highly relevant papers | | 2. Expand via concepts | OpenAlex concept graph | Find thematically related work | | 3. Forward citation | OpenAlex cites filter | Find recent derivative works | | 4. Backward citation | referenced_works field | Find foundational papers | | 5. Deduplicate | OpenAlex work ID matching | Remove duplicates across steps | | 6. Rank & filter | Sort by year, citations, relevance | Prioritize reading order |
pythondef build_reading_list(seed_ids, max_papers=50): """Build a ranked reading list from seed papers.""" seen = set() candidates = [] for seed_id in seed_ids: # Get concepts from seed paper paper = requests.get(f"https://api.openalex.org/works/{seed_id}", headers=HEADERS).json() concept_ids = [c["id"] for c in paper.get("concepts", [])[:2]] # Find related works via concepts for cid in concept_ids: related = requests.get( "https://api.openalex.org/works", params={"filter": f"concepts.id:{cid}", "sort": "cited_by_count:desc", "per_page": 20}, headers=HEADERS ).json().get("results", []) for w in related: wid = w.get("id", "").split("/")[-1] if wid not in seen: seen.add(wid) candidates.append(w) # Get citing works citing = requests.get( "https://api.openalex.org/works", params={"filter": f"cites:{seed_id}", "sort": "cited_by_count:desc", "per_page": 20}, headers=HEADERS ).json().get("results", []) for w in citing: wid = w.get("id", "").split("/")[-1] if wid not in seen: seen.add(wid) candidates.append(w) # Rank by citation count and recency candidates.sort(key=lambda p: (p.get("publication_year", 0), p.get("cited_by_count", 0)), reverse=True) return candidates[:max_papers]
User-Agent headerselect parameter to reduce payload sizepage and per_page for pagination on large result sets| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 33,046 | 27,233 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,033 | 5,267 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 14,051 | 4,586 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,600 | 2,522 | -3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 4,387 | 5,924 | +35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 804 | 2,647 | +229% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 6,443 | 4,693 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,107 | 2,673 | +141% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 5,593 | 3,990 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 923 | 2,302 | +149% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 8,329 | 5,771 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,343 | 2,747 | +105% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 7,121 | 5,618 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,441 | 2,718 | +89% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 3,277 | 2,701 | -18% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 555 | 2,144 | +286% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 7,934 | 4,428 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,384 | 2,320 | +68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 13,641 | 10,661 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,344 | 3,580 | +53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 12,219 | 10,625 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,910 | 3,508 | +84% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 4,845 | 4,903 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 793 | 2,584 | +226% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 8,642 | 4,090 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,415 | 2,343 | +66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 11,586 | 8,575 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,010 | 3,126 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 6,510 | 5,237 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,165 | 2,523 | +117% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 17,015 | 10,268 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,695 | 3,337 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 4,050 | 3,396 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 750 | 2,351 | +213% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 13,212 | 3,472 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,216 | 2,267 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | 9,601 | 10,434 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,623 | 3,374 | +108% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | 11,731 | 10,669 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,390 | 3,844 | +61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 19,007 | 20,379 | +7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,014 | 5,799 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 42,614 | 27,046 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,438 | 6,829 | +99% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 3,570 | 2,117 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 570 | 2,013 | +253% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.