Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Create and audit presentations (Beamer or Quarto RevealJS). Combines talk creation, visual audit, and compilation. Replaces /create-talk, /visual-audit, /compile-latex (for talks).
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 39% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 16% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -57% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 256% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 6% | 0% |
Create, audit, or compile presentations (Beamer or Quarto RevealJS).
Input: $ARGUMENTS — mode and format/path.
/talk create [format] — Create Beamer Talk/talk create [format] --quarto — Create Quarto RevealJS TalkGenerate a presentation from the paper.
Agents: Storyteller (creator) → storyteller-critic (reviewer)
| Format | Slides | Duration | Content Scope | |--------|--------|----------|---------------| | job-market | 40-50 | 45-60 min | Full story, all results, mechanism, robustness | | seminar | 25-35 | 30-45 min | Motivation, main result, 2 robustness, conclusion | | short | 10-15 | 15 min | Question, method, key result, implication | | lightning | 3-5 | 5 min | Hook, one result, so-what |
Step 1: Parse Arguments
job-market | seminar | short | lightningpaper/main.tex--quarto)Step 2: Dispatch Storyteller
Read the paper and extract: research question, identification strategy, main result, secondary results, robustness checks, key figures/tables, institutional background. Design narrative arc for the chosen format. Build the slide file with shared preamble if available.
The Storyteller follows these design principles:
Compile with XeLaTeX (Beamer) or quarto render (Quarto).
Save to paper/talks/[format]_talk.tex (Beamer) or paper/quarto/[format]_talk.qmd (Quarto).
Step 3: Dispatch Storyteller-Critic
After the Storyteller returns, dispatch the storyteller-critic to review across 5 categories:
| Category | What It Checks | |----------|---------------| | Narrative flow | Does the story build properly? Is there a clear arc from motivation through results to implications? Are transitions smooth? | | Visual quality | Text overflow, font readability (>= 10pt), figure sizing, consistent formatting, overfull hbox warnings | | Content fidelity | Every claim traceable to the paper — no orphan results, no unsupported statements | | Scope for format | Right amount of content for the duration — not cramming a seminar into a lightning talk, not padding a short talk to seminar length | | Compilation | Does it compile cleanly without errors or warnings? |
Score as advisory (non-blocking). Save report to quality_reports/[format]_talk_review.md.
Step 4: Fix Critical Issues
If the storyteller-critic finds Critical issues (compilation failures, content not in paper):
Step 5: Present Results
Report to the user:
/talk audit [file] — Visual AuditCheck existing slides for layout issues.
Run visual quality checks:
/talk compile [file] — Compile Talk3-pass XeLaTeX compilation for Beamer:
bashcd paper/talks && TEXINPUTS=../preambles:$TEXINPUTS xelatex -interaction=nonstopmode [file]
For Quarto:
bashcd paper/quarto && quarto render [file]
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.