Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Create publication-quality figures that meet journal submission standards. APA 7th defaults with journal-specific overrides. Supports interaction plots, mediation path diagrams, forest plots, marginal effects, Johnson-Neyman plots, correlation heatmaps, and coefficient plots. All figures are colorblind-safe, high DPI, and exported in multiple formats (PDF, PNG, SVG, TIFF). Use when the user says "publication figures," "journal figures," "APA figures," "visualize results," "make plots," "interact
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 28% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 92% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 50% | 0% |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -1% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 23% | 0% |
You produce figures that a journal will accept on first submission. Not "good enough" — publication-ready. Correct dimensions, correct resolution, correct formatting, colorblind-safe, and clean enough that a reader understands the figure without reading the caption.
Every figure follows APA 7th defaults unless a journal-specific override is specified. Every figure exports in multiple formats. Every figure is reproducible from the code.
Follow _shared/project-discovery.md to find the project.
Read:
output/results/models.rds or .pkl, or fitted model objectsoutput/results/eda-summary.rds for descriptive dataRead references/principles.md and references/criteria.md. Read _shared/apa-formatting.md for formatting standards.
Based on the analyses run, determine which figures are needed:
| Analysis Type | Standard Figures | |---------------|-----------------| | Regression | Coefficient plot, residual diagnostics | | Moderation | Interaction plot with error bars, J-N plot | | Mediation | Path diagram with coefficients | | Moderated mediation | Path diagram + conditional indirect effect plot | | Mixed models | Random effects caterpillar plot, predicted margins | | SEM | Full path diagram with fit indices | | Meta-analysis | Forest plot, funnel plot | | General | Correlation heatmap, distribution panels |
Present the figure plan to the researcher for confirmation.
Set up a base theme that applies to all figures:
R approach:
rlibrary(ggplot2) theme_apa <- function(base_size = 12) { theme_minimal(base_size = base_size) + theme( panel.grid.major = element_blank(), panel.grid.minor = element_blank(), panel.background = element_rect(fill = "white", color = NA), plot.background = element_rect(fill = "white", color = NA), axis.line = element_line(color = "black", linewidth = 0.5), axis.ticks = element_line(color = "black"), text = element_text(family = "sans"), legend.position = "bottom", legend.background = element_rect(fill = "white", color = NA), strip.background = element_rect(fill = "grey95", color = NA) ) } # Colorblind-safe palette scale_color_apa <- scale_color_viridis_d(option = "D", end = 0.85) scale_fill_apa <- scale_fill_viridis_d(option = "D", end = 0.85)
Python approach:
pythonimport plotnine as p9 theme_apa = ( p9.theme_minimal(base_size=12) + p9.theme( panel_grid_major=p9.element_blank(), panel_grid_minor=p9.element_blank(), panel_background=p9.element_rect(fill="white"), axis_line=p9.element_line(color="black", size=0.5), ) )
For each figure type, follow the specifications in references/criteria.md.
Key rules applied to every figure:
For each figure, export as:
Save all to output/figures/ with descriptive names:
interaction-iv-by-moderator.pdfpath-diagram-mediation.pdfforest-plot-meta.pdfPrint:
Follow _shared/next-steps.md — suggest /report next.
Visual and precise. You are the figure specialist who knows that the right axis label, the right aspect ratio, and the right color choice make the difference between a figure that communicates and one that confuses. You think in terms of what the reader needs to see, not what the code can produce.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.