Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Build collaborative forensic incident timelines using Timesketch to ingest, normalize, and analyze multi-source event data for attack chain reconstruction and investigation documentation.
.claude/skills/building-incident-timeline-with-timesketch/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Timesketch is an open-source collaborative forensic timeline analysis tool developed by Google that enables security teams to visualize and analyze chronological data from multiple sources during incident investigations. It ingests logs and artifacts from endpoints, servers, and cloud services, normalizes them into a unified searchable timeline, and provides powerful analysis capabilities including built-in analyzers, tagging, sketch annotations, and story building. Timesketch integrates with Plaso (log2timeline) for artifact parsing and supports direct CSV/JSONL ingestion for rapid timeline construction during active incidents.
Evidence Sources --> Plaso/log2timeline --> Plaso storage file (.plaso)
| |
v v
CSV/JSONL --> Timesketch Importer --> OpenSearch Index
|
v
Timesketch Web UI
(Search, Analyze, Story)bash# Clone Timesketch repository git clone https://github.com/google/timesketch.git cd timesketch # Run deployment helper script cd docker sudo docker compose up -d # Default access: https://localhost:443 # Admin credentials generated during first run
bash# Process disk image with log2timeline log2timeline.py --storage-file evidence.plaso /path/to/disk/image # Process Windows event logs log2timeline.py --parsers winevtx --storage-file windows_events.plaso /path/to/evtx/ # Process multiple evidence sources log2timeline.py --parsers "winevtx,prefetch,amcache,shimcache,userassist" \ --storage-file full_analysis.plaso /path/to/mounted/image/ # Import Plaso file into Timesketch timesketch_importer -s "Case-2025-001" -t "Endpoint-WKS01" evidence.plaso
csvmessage,datetime,timestamp_desc,source,hostname "User login detected","2025-01-15T08:30:00Z","Event Recorded","Security Log","DC01" "PowerShell execution","2025-01-15T08:31:15Z","Event Recorded","PowerShell","WKS042"
bash# Import CSV directly timesketch_importer -s "Case-2025-001" -t "Quick-Triage" events.csv
json{"message": "Suspicious logon from 10.1.2.3", "datetime": "2025-01-15T08:30:00Z", "timestamp_desc": "Event Recorded", "source_short": "Security", "hostname": "DC01"}
bash# Upload Sigma rules for automated detection timesketch_importer --sigma-rules /path/to/sigma/rules/
1. Log into Timesketch web interface
2. Create new sketch (investigation case)
3. Add relevant timelines to the sketch
4. Set sketch description and tagsTimesketch includes analyzers that automatically identify:
# Search examples in Timesketch query language
# Find all events related to specific user
source_short:Security AND message:"john.admin"
# Find PowerShell execution events
data_type:"windows:evtx:record" AND event_identifier:4104
# Find lateral movement indicators
source_short:Security AND event_identifier:4624 AND xml_string:"LogonType\">3"
# Find events within specific time range
datetime:[2025-01-15T00:00:00 TO 2025-01-15T23:59:59]
# Find file creation events
data_type:"fs:stat" AND timestamp_desc:"Creation Time"
# Search with tags
tag:"suspicious" OR tag:"lateral_movement"1. Create new story within the sketch
2. Add search views that support each finding
3. Annotate key events with investigator notes
4. Link events to MITRE ATT&CK techniques
5. Document the attack narrative chronologically
6. Export story for inclusion in incident reportpythonfrom timesketch_api_client import config from timesketch_api_client import client as ts_client # Connect to Timesketch ts = ts_client.TimesketchApi( host_uri="https://timesketch.local", username="analyst", password="password" ) # Get sketch sketch = ts.get_sketch(1) # Search events search = sketch.explore( query_string='event_identifier:4624 AND LogonType:3', return_fields='datetime,message,hostname,source_short' ) # Add tags to events for event in search.get('objects', []): sketch.tag_event(event['_id'], ['lateral_movement'])
bash# Use Dissect for faster artifact parsing (alternative to Plaso) target-query -f timesketch://timesketch.local/case-001 \ targets/hostname/ -q "windows.evtx" --limit 0
| Source | Parser | Evidence Value | |--------|--------|---------------| | Windows Event Logs (.evtx) | winevtx | Authentication, process execution, services | | Prefetch Files | prefetch | Program execution history | | MFT ($MFT) | mft | File system activity | | Registry Hives | winreg | System configuration, persistence | | Browser History | chrome/firefox | Web activity, downloads | | Syslog | syslog | Linux/network device events | | CloudTrail Logs | jsonl | AWS API activity | | Azure Activity Logs | jsonl | Azure resource operations | | Firewall Logs | csv/jsonl | Network connections | | Proxy Logs | csv/jsonl | HTTP/HTTPS traffic |
| Technique | Timeline Indicators | |-----------|-------------------| | Initial Access (TA0001) | First malicious event, phishing email receipt | | Execution (T1059) | PowerShell/CMD events, process creation | | Persistence (TA0003) | Registry modifications, scheduled tasks, services | | Lateral Movement (TA0008) | Remote logons, SMB connections, RDP sessions | | Exfiltration (TA0010) | Large data transfers, cloud storage uploads |
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +36 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.