Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Build a structured SOC escalation matrix defining severity tiers, response SLAs, escalation paths, and notification procedures for security incidents.
.claude/skills/building-soc-escalation-matrix/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-24 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
A SOC escalation matrix defines how security incidents move through the organization based on severity, impact, and response requirements. Modern SOCs use context-driven escalation combining business risk, asset criticality, and data sensitivity rather than purely severity-based models. Organizations using AI and automation in their SOC cut detection-and-containment lifecycle to approximately 161 days, an 80-day improvement over the 241-day industry average.
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Active data breach, ransomware spreading, critical systems compromised | | Business Impact | Revenue loss, regulatory exposure, customer data at risk | | Initial Response | 15 minutes | | Escalation to Tier 2 | Immediate | | Escalation to Management | 30 minutes | | Resolution Target | 4 hours | | Communication | Every 30 minutes to stakeholders | | Examples | Active ransomware, confirmed data exfiltration, domain admin compromise |
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Confirmed compromise, limited scope, no active exfiltration | | Business Impact | Potential revenue impact, contained risk | | Initial Response | 30 minutes | | Escalation to Tier 2 | 30 minutes if unresolved | | Escalation to Management | 2 hours | | Resolution Target | 8 hours | | Communication | Every 2 hours to SOC management | | Examples | Compromised user account, malware on single endpoint, insider threat indicator |
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Suspicious activity requiring investigation | | Business Impact | Low immediate risk | | Initial Response | 4 hours | | Escalation to Tier 2 | 8 hours if unresolved | | Resolution Target | 24 hours | | Communication | Daily status update | | Examples | Policy violation, failed brute force, suspicious email report |
| Attribute | Value | |---|---| | Impact | Informational alerts, routine security events | | Business Impact | Minimal | | Initial Response | 8 hours | | Escalation | Only if pattern emerges | | Resolution Target | 72 hours | | Communication | Weekly summary | | Examples | Vulnerability scan findings, expired certificates, policy exceptions |
Asset Criticality
Low Medium High Critical
Severity Low P4 P4 P3 P3
Medium P4 P3 P2 P2
High P3 P2 P2 P1
Critical P2 P1 P1 P1| Trigger | Action | |---|---| | Ransomware detected on any endpoint | P1 - Immediate Tier 3 + Management | | Domain admin account compromise | P1 - Immediate Tier 3 + Management | | Active data exfiltration to external IP | P1 - Immediate Tier 3 + Management | | Critical infrastructure (DC, SCADA) alert | P1 - Immediate Tier 2 minimum | | Executive account anomaly | P2 - Immediate Tier 2 | | Multiple hosts with same malware | P1 - Immediate Tier 2 |
| Condition | Action | |---|---| | P2 unresolved after 4 hours | Escalate to Tier 3 | | P3 unresolved after 12 hours | Escalate to Tier 2 | | Any incident unresolved past SLA | Escalate to SOC Manager | | P1 unresolved after 2 hours | Escalate to CISO |
SUBJECT: [P1 CRITICAL] Security Incident - {Incident_ID}
Incident Summary:
- Type: {incident_type}
- Affected Systems: {systems}
- Affected Users: {users}
- Current Status: {status}
- Assigned To: {analyst}
Impact Assessment:
- Business Impact: {impact}
- Data at Risk: {data_risk}
- Containment Status: {containment}
Next Actions:
- {action_1}
- {action_2}
Next Update: {time} (30-minute intervals)
Bridge Line: {conference_details}yaml# XSOAR escalation playbook trigger trigger: condition: incident.severity == "critical" AND incident.asset_criticality == "high" action: - assign_tier: 3 - notify: [soc_manager, ciso] - create_war_room: true - start_bridge: true - set_sla: 4h auto_escalation_rules: - name: P2 Time-Based Escalation condition: incident.severity == "high" AND incident.age > 4h AND incident.status != "resolved" action: - escalate_tier: 3 - notify: soc_manager - add_comment: "Auto-escalated due to SLA breach"
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-25 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-24 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 25 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 25 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.