Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Use when writing a recruiter's first-touch cold outreach (InMail or email) to a passive candidate who has had no prior contact — structures it as one specific role-to-candidate hook, the role's single headline draw, and one low-friction ask kept under ~125 words, instead of a long generic pitch padded with company boilerplate and a perk-dump. Do NOT use for replies to candidates who already applied or responded, interview scheduling logistics, rejection notes, or offer letters.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 284% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 308% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 295% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 299% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 295% | 0% |
The first message a recruiter sends to a passive candidate who has never heard from them. Base models default to a long, flattering, everything-about-us note: a generic opener ("I came across your profile and was very impressed"), a paragraph of company boilerplate ("we're a fast-growing, well-funded team backed by top-tier investors"), a pile of perks (comp, equity, remote, unlimited PTO, great culture), and a vague or stacked ask. Passive candidates skim that on a phone and ignore it. A cold outreach earns a reply by proving this message was written for this person about one thing worth their attention.
Write every first-touch candidate outreach in these four moves.
The first line proves you know who they are and why you're reaching out to them for this role. Reference a concrete detail from their background — a system they built, a domain they work in, a technology on their profile, the kind of team they've led — and connect it to what the role needs.
background is amazing", "You have an incredible profile." These say nothing and mark the message as a blast. Cut them — start on the specific detail.
"this role owns exactly that problem," not "you seem very talented."
Pick the SINGLE most compelling thing about this opportunity for this candidate and say it plainly — the scope, the problem, the team, the growth, or the mission that would actually make them consider a move.
candidate is likely to want given their background. Listing all five buries the one that matters and reads as a template.
infra hire, you set the architecture"), not a company brag ("we raised a Series B").
Do not paste a paragraph about the company's funding, investors, growth rate, or awards, and do not enumerate perks (comp band, equity, remote policy, PTO, snacks). A cold outreach is not a job description. One concrete draw beats a bulleted list of benefits. If you're tempted to write "we also offer…", stop — that belongs in a later conversation, not the first touch.
End with a single, small, easy-to-answer request — an invitation to talk, not a task.
week?", "Worth a 15-minute call to see if it's a fit?", "Mind if I send a few details?" A single reply should satisfy it.
stack asks ("reply with times, send your resume, and let me know your salary expectations"). Each extra request is a reason to defer, and asking a passive candidate to apply assumes a decision they haven't made yet.
Keep the whole message under ~125 words. Short is the point — a passive candidate skims it in seconds between meetings. If it runs long, the hook and the ask are the parts that survive; cut everything else.
Candidate: a staff engineer whose profile points to years spent building large-scale search and ranking infrastructure at a consumer marketplace. Role: first platform hire at an early-stage company, owning the core indexing and query system. A conforming message:
> Your work on the search infra at their company] caught my eye — you've been living in > exactly the latency-and-relevance problems this role is built around. > > We're hiring our first platform engineer to own the indexing and query stack top to bottom — > you'd set the architecture rather than inherit someone else's. > > Open to a quick chat this week to see if it's a fit?
Notice: the opener names a specific detail from their background tied to the role, exactly one headline draw (owning the system as first hire), no funding/perk paragraph, one small ask that isn't "apply" — and it's well under 125 words.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.