Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Socratic ideation and idea routing — think through ideas before committing to plans
.claude/skills/coco-research-gsd-explore/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 20% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -7% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -26% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -11% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -86% | 0% |
<objective> Open-ended Socratic ideation session. Guides the developer through exploring an idea via probing questions, optionally spawns research, then routes outputs to the appropriate GSD artifacts (notes, todos, seeds, research questions, requirements, or new phases).
Accepts an optional topic argument: /gsd-explore authentication strategy </objective>
<execution_context> @$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/explore.md </execution_context>
<process> Execute the explore workflow from @$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/explore.md end-to-end. </process>
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-04 | pass→pass | 15,752 | 14,026 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,662 | 1,468 | -12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 29,712 | 10,465 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,158 | 1,731 | -58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | 11,852 | 20,321 | +71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,102 | 1,325 | +20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 13,191 | 11,130 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,093 | 1,020 | -7% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 24,388 | 13,026 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,930 | 1,419 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 25,153 | 15,009 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,037 | 1,598 | -47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 14,050 | 5,242 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,233 | 953 | -57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 15,531 | 8,760 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,290 | 1,500 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | 19,695 | 9,388 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,521 | 318 | -87% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 14,869 | 15,083 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,490 | 397 | -73% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→fail | 18,905 | 19,871 | +5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,097 | 286 | -86% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→fail | 12,238 | 11,153 | -9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 970 | 305 | -69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→fail | 18,584 | 13,979 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,131 | 1,290 | -39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→fail | 17,301 | 18,272 | +6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,934 | 318 | -84% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 14,993 | 11,685 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,498 | 1,225 | -18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 14,303 | 17,253 | +21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,391 | 2,139 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 22,343 | 7,837 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,223 | 1,299 | -60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 17,891 | 8,961 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,768 | 1,304 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→fail | 11,077 | 9,746 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,443 | 418 | -71% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 9,970 | 6,471 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 909 | 1,205 | +33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 3,286 | 9,555 | +191% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 656 | 1,040 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 9,763 | 9,677 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 199 | 441 | +122% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 1,888 | 8,389 | +344% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 338 | 732 | +117% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 16 counted toward the lift figure. The other 7 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of -4 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 16 comparable cases. 6 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.