Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Deep audit before GitHub push: removes junk files, dead code, security holes, and optimization issues. Checks every file line-by-line for production readiness.
.claude/skills/codebase-audit-pre-push/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-21 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-08 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
As a senior engineer, you're doing the final review before pushing this code to GitHub. Check everything carefully and fix problems as you find them.
Review the entire codebase file by file. Read the code carefully. Fix issues right away. Don't just note problems—make the necessary changes.
Start by looking for files that shouldn't be on GitHub:
Delete these immediately:
.DS_Store, Thumbs.db, desktop.ini *.log, npm-debug.log*, yarn-error.log* *.tmp, *.temp, *.cache, *.swp dist/, build/, .next/, out/, .cache/ node_modules/, vendor/, __pycache__/, *.pyc .idea/, .vscode/ (ask user first), *.iml, .project *.bak, *_old.*, *_backup.*, *_copy.* coverage/, .nyc_output/, test-results/ TODO.txt, NOTES.txt, scratch.*, test123.* Critical - Check for secrets:
.env files (should never be committed) password, api_key, token, secret, private_key *.pem, *.key, *.cert, credentials.json, serviceAccountKey.json If you find secrets in the code, mark it as a CRITICAL BLOCKER.
Check if the .gitignore file exists and is thorough. If it’s missing or not complete, update it to include all junk file patterns above. Ensure that .env.example exists with keys but no values.
Look through each code file and check:
Dead Code (remove immediately):
return, inside if (false)) Code Quality (fix issues as you go):
data, info, temp, thing → rename to be descriptive if (status === 3) → extract to named constant console.log, print(), debugger any: add proper types or explain why any is used === instead of == in JavaScript Logic Issues (critical):
.catch() or try/catch default in switch statements Secrets: Search for hardcoded passwords, API keys, and tokens. They must be in environment variables.
Injection vulnerabilities:
exec() with user-provided input innerHTML or dangerouslySetInnerHTML with user data Auth/Authorization:
Data exposure:
Dependencies:
npm audit or an equivalent tool Database:
SELECT *: specify columns API Design:
Code:
Organization:
Separation of concerns:
Reusability:
Backend:
Frontend (if applicable):
README.md must include:
Code comments:
test.only or fdescribe should remain in the code test.skip without an explanation After making all changes, run the app. Ensure nothing is broken. Check that:
After auditing, provide a report:
CODEBASE AUDIT COMPLETE
FILES REMOVED:
- node_modules/ (build artifact)
- .env (contained secrets)
- old_backup.js (unused duplicate)
CODE CHANGES:
[src/api/users.js]
✂ Removed unused import: lodash
✂ Removed dead function: formatOldWay()
🔧 Renamed 'data' → 'userData' for clarity
🛡 Added try/catch around API call (line 47)
[src/db/queries.js]
⚡ Fixed N+1 query: now uses JOIN instead of loop
SECURITY ISSUES:
🚨 CRITICAL: Hardcoded API key in config.js (line 12) → moved to .env
⚠️ HIGH: SQL injection risk in search.js (line 34) → fixed with parameterized query
SCALABILITY:
⚡ Added pagination to /api/users endpoint
⚡ Added index on users.email column
FINAL STATUS:
✅ CLEAN - Ready to push to GitHub
Scores:
Security: 9/10 (one minor header missing)
Code Quality: 10/10
Scalability: 9/10
Overall: 9/10 @security-auditor - Deeper security review @systematic-debugging - Investigate specific issues @git-pushing - Push code after audit| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-21 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 22 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +13 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.