Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Create Git branches following the Conventional Branch specification (feature/, bugfix/, hotfix/, release/, chore/). Use when creating a new branch, naming a branch, or checking whether a branch name complies with the spec.
.claude/skills/conventional-branch/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Create Git branches that follow the Conventional Branch specification — a simple, consistent convention for naming Git branches.
<type>/<description>| Type | Alias | Purpose | |------|-------|---------| | feature/ | feat/ | New features or enhancements | | bugfix/ | fix/ | Bug fixes | | hotfix/ | — | Urgent production fixes | | release/ | — | Release preparation (dots allowed in version: release/v1.2.0) | | chore/ | — | Non-code tasks (deps, docs, config) |
main, master, and develop are trunk branches — they do not use a prefix. Never create new branches with the same names as trunk branches; branch off them instead.
a-z, 0-9, -, .release/ version descriptions (e.g., release/v1.2.0)--), dots (..), or hyphen-dot adjacency (-. or .-)main
master
develop
feature/add-login-page
feat/add-login-page
bugfix/fix-header-bug
fix/header-bug
hotfix/security-patch
release/v1.2.0
chore/update-dependencies
feature/issue-123-new-login| Branch | Problem | |--------|---------| | Feature/Add-Login | Uppercase letters | | feature/new--login | Consecutive hyphens | | feature/-new-login | Leading hyphen | | feature/new-login- | Trailing hyphen | | release/v1.-2.0 | Hyphen adjacent to dot | | fix/header bug | Space | | fix/header_bug | Underscore | | unknown/some-task | Unknown prefix type |
add-oauth-login, fix-header-overflow, update-ci-configfix-bug, new-featureFollow these steps:
Step 1 — Determine Branch Type
Ask the user (if not already clear):
feature when uncertainIf the user mentions a ticket or issue number, include it in the description (e.g., feature/issue-123-add-oauth).
Step 2 — Validate the Name
Check the assembled name against the Naming Rules above. If any rule fails, fix it:
Step 3 — Detect the Base Branch
Different repos use different trunk branches. Detect which one this repo uses:
bash# Prefer the remote's default branch git symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's|^origin/||'
If that returns nothing, check which trunk branch exists locally (priority order: develop, main, master):
bashfor b in develop main master; do git show-ref --verify --quiet "refs/heads/$b" && echo "$b" && break done
Step 4 — Create and Checkout
bashgit checkout <base> git pull origin <base> git checkout -b <type>/<description>
Step 5 — Confirm
Tell the user:
git push -u origin <branch-name> when readyConventional Branch complements Conventional Commits:
| Conventional Branch | Typical Conventional Commit | |---------------------|----------------------------| | feature/add-login | feat: add login page | | bugfix/fix-header | fix: header overflow on mobile | | chore/update-deps | chore: bump lodash to 5.0 | | release/v1.2.0 | chore: release v1.2.0 |
Align the branch type with commit types where possible (e.g., feature/* branches with feat: commits).
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.