Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Create an llms.txt file from scratch based on repository structure following the llms.txt specification at https://llmstxt.org/
.claude/skills/create-llms/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-11 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
| case-05 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
Create a new llms.txt file from scratch in the root of the repository following the official llms.txt specification at https://llmstxt.org/. This file provides high-level guidance to large language models (LLMs) on where to find relevant content for understanding the repository's purpose and specifications.
Create a comprehensive llms.txt file that serves as an entry point for LLMs to understand and navigate the repository effectively. The file must comply with the llms.txt specification and be optimized for LLM consumption while remaining human-readable.
Before creating the llms.txt file, you must complete a thorough analysis:
.md files in /docs/, /spec/, etc.)Based on your analysis, create a structured plan that includes:
The llms.txt file must follow this exact structure per the specification:
Each file link must follow: [descriptive-name](relative-url): optional description
Organize files into logical H2 sections such as:
Include files that:
Exclude files that:
llms.txt file in the repository root/llms.txt)txt# [Repository Name] > [Concise description of the repository's purpose and scope] [Optional additional context paragraphs without headings] ## Documentation - [Main README](README.md): Primary project documentation and getting started guide - [Contributing Guide](CONTRIBUTING.md): Guidelines for contributing to the project - [Code of Conduct](CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md): Community guidelines and expectations ## Specifications - [Technical Specification](spec/technical-spec.md): Detailed technical requirements and constraints - [API Specification](spec/api-spec.md): Interface definitions and data contracts ## Examples - [Basic Example](examples/basic-usage.md): Simple usage demonstration - [Advanced Example](examples/advanced-usage.md): Complex implementation patterns ## Configuration - [Setup Guide](docs/setup.md): Installation and configuration instructions - [Deployment Guide](docs/deployment.md): Production deployment guidelines ## Optional - [Architecture Documentation](docs/architecture.md): Detailed system architecture - [Design Decisions](docs/decisions.md): Historical design decision records
The created llms.txt file should:
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 13 counted toward the lift figure. The other 9 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of 0 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 13 comparable cases. 9 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.