Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -6% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 33% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 73% | 0% |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -24% | 0% |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 66% | 0% |
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code. Vulnerabilities can exist in software due to unsecure coding practices that can lead to unanticipated behavior. Adversaries can take advantage of certain vulnerabilities through targeted exploitation for the purpose of arbitrary code execution. Oftentimes the most valuable exploits to an offensive toolkit are those that can be used to obtain code execution on a remote system because they can be used to gain access to that system. Users will expect to see files related to the applications they commonly used to do work, so they are a useful target for exploit research and development because of their high utility.
Several types exist:
Web browsers are a common target through Drive-by Compromise and Spearphishing Link. Endpoint systems may be compromised through normal web browsing or from certain users being targeted by links in spearphishing emails to adversary controlled sites used to exploit the web browser. These often do not require an action by the user for the exploit to be executed.
Common office and productivity applications such as Microsoft Office are also targeted through Phishing. Malicious files will be transmitted directly as attachments or through links to download them. These require the user to open the document or file for the exploit to run.
Other applications that are commonly seen or are part of the software deployed in a target network may also be used for exploitation. Applications such as Adobe Reader and Flash, which are common in enterprise environments, have been routinely targeted by adversaries attempting to gain access to systems. Depending on the software and nature of the vulnerability, some may be exploited in the browser or require the user to open a file. For instance, some Flash exploits have been delivered as objects within Microsoft Office documents.
Platforms: Linux, macOS, Windows
> Note: No Atomic Red Team tests available for this technique. See Atomic Red Team GitHub for updates.
Security applications that look for behavior used during exploitation such as Windows Defender Exploit Guard (WDEG) and the Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit (EMET) can be used to mitigate some exploitation behavior. Control flow integrity checking is another way to potentially identify and stop a software exploit from occurring. Many of these protections depend on the architecture and target application binary for compatibility.
Perform regular software updates to mitigate exploitation risk. Keeping software up-to-date with the latest security patches helps prevent adversaries from exploiting known vulnerabilities in client software, reducing the risk of successful attacks.
Browser sandboxes can be used to mitigate some of the impact of exploitation, but sandbox escapes may still exist.
Other types of virtualization and application microsegmentation may also mitigate the impact of client-side exploitation. Risks of additional exploits and weaknesses in those systems may still exist.
| Finding | Severity | Impact | | ------------------------------------------------------ | -------- | --------- | | Exploitation for Client Execution technique applicable | High | Execution |
| CWE ID | Title | | ------ | -------------------------------------- | | CWE-94 | Improper Control of Generation of Code |
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.