Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Transform raw data into compelling narratives that drive decisions and inspire action.
.claude/skills/data-storytelling/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-10 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-04 | ✗→✗ | = Same ✗ | — | — |
Transform raw data into compelling narratives that drive decisions and inspire action.
resources/implementation-playbook.md.Setup → Conflict → Resolution
Setup: Context and baseline
Conflict: The problem or opportunity
Resolution: Insights and recommendations1. Hook: Grab attention with surprising insight
2. Context: Establish the baseline
3. Rising Action: Build through data points
4. Climax: The key insight
5. Resolution: Recommendations
6. Call to Action: Next steps| Pillar | Purpose | Components | | ------------- | -------- | -------------------------------- | | Data | Evidence | Numbers, trends, comparisons | | Narrative | Meaning | Context, causation, implications | | Visuals | Clarity | Charts, diagrams, highlights |
markdown# Customer Churn Analysis ## The Hook "We're losing $2.4M annually to preventable churn." ## The Context - Current churn rate: 8.5% (industry average: 5%) - Average customer lifetime value: $4,800 - 500 customers churned last quarter ## The Problem Analysis of churned customers reveals a pattern: - 73% churned within first 90 days - Common factor: < 3 support interactions - Low feature adoption in first month ## The Insight [Show engagement curve visualization] Customers who don't engage in the first 14 days are 4x more likely to churn. ## The Solution 1. Implement 14-day onboarding sequence 2. Proactive outreach at day 7 3. Feature adoption tracking ## Expected Impact - Reduce early churn by 40% - Save $960K annually - Payback period: 3 months ## Call to Action Approve $50K budget for onboarding automation.
markdown# Q4 Performance Analysis ## Where We Started Q3 ended with $1.2M MRR, 15% below target. Team morale was low after missed goals. ## What Changed [Timeline visualization] - Oct: Launched self-serve pricing - Nov: Reduced friction in signup - Dec: Added customer success calls ## The Transformation [Before/after comparison chart] | Metric | Q3 | Q4 | Change | |----------------|--------|--------|--------| | Trial → Paid | 8% | 15% | +87% | | Time to Value | 14 days| 5 days | -64% | | Expansion Rate | 2% | 8% | +300% | ## Key Insight Self-serve + high-touch creates compound growth. Customers who self-serve AND get a success call have 3x higher expansion rate. ## Going Forward Double down on hybrid model. Target: $1.8M MRR by Q2.
markdown# Market Opportunity Analysis ## The Question Should we expand into EMEA or APAC first? ## The Comparison [Side-by-side market analysis] ### EMEA - Market size: $4.2B - Growth rate: 8% - Competition: High - Regulatory: Complex (GDPR) - Language: Multiple ### APAC - Market size: $3.8B - Growth rate: 15% - Competition: Moderate - Regulatory: Varied - Language: Multiple ## The Analysis [Weighted scoring matrix visualization] | Factor | Weight | EMEA Score | APAC Score | | ----------- | ------ | ---------- | ---------- | | Market Size | 25% | 5 | 4 | | Growth | 30% | 3 | 5 | | Competition | 20% | 2 | 4 | | Ease | 25% | 2 | 3 | | **Total** | | **2.9** | **4.1** | ## The Recommendation APAC first. Higher growth, less competition. Start with Singapore hub (English, business-friendly). Enter EMEA in Year 2 with localization ready. ## Risk Mitigation - Timezone coverage: Hire 24/7 support - Cultural fit: Local partnerships - Payment: Multi-currency from day 1
markdownStart simple, add layers: Slide 1: "Revenue is growing" [single line chart] Slide 2: "But growth is slowing" [add growth rate overlay] Slide 3: "Driven by one segment" [add segment breakdown] Slide 4: "Which is saturating" [add market share] Slide 5: "We need new segments" [add opportunity zones]
markdownBefore/After: ┌─────────────────┬─────────────────┐ │ BEFORE │ AFTER │ │ │ │ │ Process: 5 days│ Process: 1 day │ │ Errors: 15% │ Errors: 2% │ │ Cost: $50/unit │ Cost: $20/unit │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ This/That (emphasize difference): ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CUSTOMER A vs B │ │ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │ │ │ ████████ │ │ ██ │ │ │ │ $45,000 │ │ $8,000 │ │ │ │ LTV │ │ LTV │ │ │ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │ │ Onboarded No onboarding │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘
pythonimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt import pandas as pd fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(12, 6)) # Plot the main data ax.plot(dates, revenue, linewidth=2, color='#2E86AB') # Add annotation for key events ax.annotate( 'Product Launch\n+32% spike', xy=(launch_date, launch_revenue), xytext=(launch_date, launch_revenue * 1.2), fontsize=10, arrowprops=dict(arrowstyle='->', color='#E63946'), color='#E63946' ) # Highlight a region ax.axvspan(growth_start, growth_end, alpha=0.2, color='green', label='Growth Period') # Add threshold line ax.axhline(y=target, color='gray', linestyle='--', label=f'Target: ${target:,.0f}') ax.set_title('Revenue Growth Story', fontsize=14, fontweight='bold') ax.legend()
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ KEY INSIGHT │
│ ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════│
│ │
│ "Customers who complete onboarding in week 1 │
│ have 3x higher lifetime value" │
│ │
├──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │ │
│ THE DATA │ THE IMPLICATION │
│ │ │
│ Week 1 completers: │ ✓ Prioritize onboarding UX │
│ • LTV: $4,500 │ ✓ Add day-1 success milestones │
│ • Retention: 85% │ ✓ Proactive week-1 outreach │
│ • NPS: 72 │ │
│ │ Investment: $75K │
│ Others: │ Expected ROI: 8x │
│ • LTV: $1,500 │ │
│ • Retention: 45% │ │
│ • NPS: 34 │ │
│ │ │
└──────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────────┘Slide 1: THE HEADLINE
"We can grow 40% faster by fixing onboarding"
Slide 2: THE CONTEXT
Current state metrics
Industry benchmarks
Gap analysis
Slide 3: THE DISCOVERY
What the data revealed
Surprising finding
Pattern identification
Slide 4: THE DEEP DIVE
Root cause analysis
Segment breakdowns
Statistical significance
Slide 5: THE RECOMMENDATION
Proposed actions
Resource requirements
Timeline
Slide 6: THE IMPACT
Expected outcomes
ROI calculation
Risk assessment
Slide 7: THE ASK
Specific request
Decision needed
Next stepsmarkdown# Monthly Business Review: January 2024 ## THE HEADLINE Revenue up 15% but CAC increasing faster than LTV ## KEY METRICS AT A GLANCE ┌────────┬────────┬────────┬────────┐ │ MRR │ NRR │ CAC │ LTV │ │ $125K │ 108% │ $450 │ $2,200 │ │ ▲15% │ ▲3% │ ▲22% │ ▲8% │ └────────┴────────┴────────┴────────┘ ## WHAT'S WORKING ✓ Enterprise segment growing 25% MoM ✓ Referral program driving 30% of new logos ✓ Support satisfaction at all-time high (94%) ## WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION ✗ SMB acquisition cost up 40% ✗ Trial conversion down 5 points ✗ Time-to-value increased by 3 days ## ROOT CAUSE [Mini chart showing SMB vs Enterprise CAC trend] SMB paid ads becoming less efficient. CPC up 35% while conversion flat. ## RECOMMENDATION 1. Shift $20K/mo from paid to content 2. Launch SMB self-serve trial 3. A/B test shorter onboarding ## NEXT MONTH'S FOCUS - Launch content marketing pilot - Complete self-serve MVP - Reduce time-to-value to < 7 days
markdownBAD: "Q4 Sales Analysis" GOOD: "Q4 Sales Beat Target by 23% - Here's Why" BAD: "Customer Churn Report" GOOD: "We're Losing $2.4M to Preventable Churn" BAD: "Marketing Performance" GOOD: "Content Marketing Delivers 4x ROI vs. Paid" Formula: [Specific Number] + [Business Impact] + [Actionable Context]
markdownBuilding the narrative: • "This leads us to ask..." • "When we dig deeper..." • "The pattern becomes clear when..." • "Contrast this with..." Introducing insights: • "The data reveals..." • "What surprised us was..." • "The inflection point came when..." • "The key finding is..." Moving to action: • "This insight suggests..." • "Based on this analysis..." • "The implication is clear..." • "Our recommendation is..."
markdownAcknowledge limitations: • "With 95% confidence, we can say..." • "The sample size of 500 shows..." • "While correlation is strong, causation requires..." • "This trend holds for [segment], though [caveat]..." Present ranges: • "Impact estimate: $400K-$600K" • "Confidence interval: 15-20% improvement" • "Best case: X, Conservative: Y"
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.