Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Schedule labor crews based on CWICR norms and project timeline. Calculate crew sizes, shifts, and labor loading curves.
.claude/skills/datadrivenconstruction-cwicr-labor-scheduler/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 277% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 146% | 0% |
| case-16 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 254% | 0% |
| case-20 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 240% | 0% |
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 100% | 0% |
Project managers need to plan labor allocation:
Data-driven labor scheduling using CWICR labor norms to generate crew schedules, loading curves, and skill requirement timelines.
pythonimport pandas as pd import numpy as np from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional, Tuple from dataclasses import dataclass, field from datetime import datetime, timedelta from enum import Enum from collections import defaultdict class ShiftType(Enum): """Work shift types.""" SINGLE = "single" # 8 hours DOUBLE = "double" # 16 hours (2 shifts) TRIPLE = "triple" # 24 hours (3 shifts) EXTENDED = "extended" # 10 hours class SkillLevel(Enum): """Worker skill levels.""" UNSKILLED = 1 SEMI_SKILLED = 2 SKILLED = 3 FOREMAN = 4 SPECIALIST = 5 @dataclass class LaborRequirement: """Labor requirement for a work item.""" work_item_code: str description: str total_hours: float skill_level: SkillLevel trade: str start_date: datetime end_date: datetime daily_hours: float = 0.0 @dataclass class CrewAssignment: """Crew assignment for a period.""" date: datetime trade: str skill_level: SkillLevel workers_needed: int hours_per_worker: float total_hours: float work_items: List[str] @dataclass class LaborSchedule: """Complete labor schedule.""" project_name: str start_date: datetime end_date: datetime total_labor_hours: float peak_workers: int average_workers: float assignments: List[CrewAssignment] daily_loading: Dict[str, int] by_trade: Dict[str, float] class CWICRLaborScheduler: """Schedule labor based on CWICR norms.""" HOURS_PER_SHIFT = { ShiftType.SINGLE: 8, ShiftType.DOUBLE: 16, ShiftType.TRIPLE: 24, ShiftType.EXTENDED: 10 } def __init__(self, cwicr_data: pd.DataFrame): self.data = cwicr_data self._index_data() def _index_data(self): """Index work items for fast lookup.""" if 'work_item_code' in self.data.columns: self._code_index = self.data.set_index('work_item_code') else: self._code_index = None def calculate_labor_requirements(self, items: List[Dict[str, Any]], project_start: datetime) -> List[LaborRequirement]: """Calculate labor requirements from work items.""" requirements = [] for item in items: code = item.get('work_item_code', item.get('code')) qty = item.get('quantity', 0) duration_days = item.get('duration_days', 1) start_offset = item.get('start_day', 0) if self._code_index is not None and code in self._code_index.index: work_item = self._code_index.loc[code] labor_norm = float(work_item.get('labor_norm', 0) or 0) total_hours = labor_norm * qty # Determine trade from category trade = self._get_trade(work_item.get('category', 'General')) skill_level = self._get_skill_level(work_item) start_date = project_start + timedelta(days=start_offset) end_date = start_date + timedelta(days=duration_days) daily_hours = total_hours / duration_days if duration_days > 0 else total_hours requirements.append(LaborRequirement( work_item_code=code, description=str(work_item.get('description', '')), total_hours=total_hours, skill_level=skill_level, trade=trade, start_date=start_date, end_date=end_date, daily_hours=daily_hours )) return requirements def _get_trade(self, category: str) -> str: """Map category to trade.""" trade_mapping = { 'concrete': 'Concrete', 'masonry': 'Masonry', 'steel': 'Steel', 'carpentry': 'Carpentry', 'plumbing': 'Plumbing', 'electrical': 'Electrical', 'hvac': 'HVAC', 'painting': 'Painting', 'excavation': 'Earthwork', 'roofing': 'Roofing' } cat_lower = str(category).lower() for key, trade in trade_mapping.items(): if key in cat_lower: return trade return 'General' def _get_skill_level(self, work_item) -> SkillLevel: """Determine skill level from work item.""" # Based on complexity or explicit field if 'skill_level' in work_item.index: level = int(work_item.get('skill_level', 3)) return SkillLevel(min(max(level, 1), 5)) return SkillLevel.SKILLED def generate_schedule(self, requirements: List[LaborRequirement], shift_type: ShiftType = ShiftType.SINGLE, max_workers_per_trade: int = 50) -> LaborSchedule: """Generate labor schedule from requirements.""" if not requirements: return LaborSchedule( project_name="", start_date=datetime.now(), end_date=datetime.now(), total_labor_hours=0, peak_workers=0, average_workers=0, assignments=[], daily_loading={}, by_trade={} ) hours_per_day = self.HOURS_PER_SHIFT[shift_type] # Find date range start_date = min(r.start_date for r in requirements) end_date = max(r.end_date for r in requirements) # Build daily labor loading daily_loading = defaultdict(lambda: defaultdict(float)) for req in requirements: current = req.start_date while current < req.end_date: date_key = current.strftime('%Y-%m-%d') daily_loading[date_key][req.trade] += req.daily_hours current += timedelta(days=1) # Convert to crew assignments assignments = [] daily_totals = {} by_trade = defaultdict(float) for date_key, trades in daily_loading.items(): date = datetime.strptime(date_key, '%Y-%m-%d') day_total = 0 for trade, hours in trades.items(): workers = int(np.ceil(hours / hours_per_day)) workers = min(workers, max_workers_per_trade) assignments.append(CrewAssignment( date=date, trade=trade, skill_level=SkillLevel.SKILLED, workers_needed=workers, hours_per_worker=hours_per_day, total_hours=hours, work_items=[] )) day_total += workers by_trade[trade] += hours daily_totals[date_key] = day_total # Statistics total_hours = sum(r.total_hours for r in requirements) peak_workers = max(daily_totals.values()) if daily_totals else 0 avg_workers = sum(daily_totals.values()) / len(daily_totals) if daily_totals else 0 return LaborSchedule( project_name="Project", start_date=start_date, end_date=end_date, total_labor_hours=total_hours, peak_workers=peak_workers, average_workers=round(avg_workers, 1), assignments=assignments, daily_loading=dict(daily_totals), by_trade=dict(by_trade) ) def level_resources(self, schedule: LaborSchedule, target_workers: int) -> LaborSchedule: """Level resources to target workforce size.""" # Resource leveling algorithm # Shifts work to reduce peaks while maintaining total hours daily_loads = schedule.daily_loading.copy() # Find days exceeding target over_days = {d: w for d, w in daily_loads.items() if w > target_workers} under_days = {d: w for d, w in daily_loads.items() if w < target_workers} # Simple leveling: can't easily shift without changing durations # Return schedule with analysis leveling_analysis = { 'days_over_target': len(over_days), 'days_under_target': len(under_days), 'max_over': max(over_days.values()) - target_workers if over_days else 0, 'leveling_possible': len(over_days) == 0 } return schedule def generate_loading_curve(self, schedule: LaborSchedule) -> pd.DataFrame: """Generate labor loading curve data.""" data = [] for date_str, workers in sorted(schedule.daily_loading.items()): data.append({ 'date': date_str, 'workers': workers, 'cumulative_hours': 0 # Would need to calculate }) df = pd.DataFrame(data) # Add cumulative hours if not df.empty: hours_per_worker = 8 # Assuming single shift df['daily_hours'] = df['workers'] * hours_per_worker df['cumulative_hours'] = df['daily_hours'].cumsum() return df def get_trade_breakdown(self, schedule: LaborSchedule) -> pd.DataFrame: """Get labor breakdown by trade.""" trade_data = [] for trade, hours in schedule.by_trade.items(): trade_data.append({ 'trade': trade, 'total_hours': round(hours, 1), 'worker_days': round(hours / 8, 1), 'percentage': round(hours / schedule.total_labor_hours * 100, 1) if schedule.total_labor_hours > 0 else 0 }) return pd.DataFrame(trade_data).sort_values('total_hours', ascending=False) def optimize_crew_composition(self, requirements: List[LaborRequirement], available_workers: Dict[str, int]) -> Dict[str, Any]: """Optimize crew composition based on availability.""" required_by_trade = defaultdict(float) for req in requirements: required_by_trade[req.trade] += req.total_hours analysis = { 'sufficient': True, 'shortages': {}, 'surplus': {}, 'recommendations': [] } for trade, hours_needed in required_by_trade.items(): workers_needed = int(np.ceil(hours_needed / 8)) # Per day available = available_workers.get(trade, 0) if workers_needed > available: analysis['sufficient'] = False analysis['shortages'][trade] = workers_needed - available analysis['recommendations'].append( f"Hire {workers_needed - available} additional {trade} workers" ) elif available > workers_needed * 1.5: analysis['surplus'][trade] = available - workers_needed return analysis class WeeklyScheduleGenerator: """Generate weekly labor schedules.""" def __init__(self, scheduler: CWICRLaborScheduler): self.scheduler = scheduler def generate_weekly_schedule(self, schedule: LaborSchedule, week_start: datetime) -> pd.DataFrame: """Generate schedule for specific week.""" week_end = week_start + timedelta(days=7) weekly_assignments = [ a for a in schedule.assignments if week_start <= a.date < week_end ] # Pivot by day and trade data = [] for a in weekly_assignments: data.append({ 'date': a.date.strftime('%Y-%m-%d'), 'day': a.date.strftime('%A'), 'trade': a.trade, 'workers': a.workers_needed, 'hours': a.total_hours }) return pd.DataFrame(data) def export_to_excel(self, schedule: LaborSchedule, output_path: str) -> str: """Export schedule to Excel.""" with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer: # Loading curve loading = self.scheduler.generate_loading_curve(schedule) loading.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Loading Curve', index=False) # Trade breakdown trades = self.scheduler.get_trade_breakdown(schedule) trades.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='By Trade', index=False) # Summary summary = pd.DataFrame([{ 'Total Labor Hours': schedule.total_labor_hours, 'Peak Workers': schedule.peak_workers, 'Average Workers': schedule.average_workers, 'Project Duration (days)': (schedule.end_date - schedule.start_date).days }]) summary.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Summary', index=False) return output_path
pythonfrom datetime import datetime # Load CWICR data cwicr = pd.read_parquet("TR_workitems_costs_resources_DDC_CWICR.parquet") # Initialize scheduler scheduler = CWICRLaborScheduler(cwicr) # Define work items with schedule items = [ {'work_item_code': 'EXCV-001', 'quantity': 500, 'duration_days': 5, 'start_day': 0}, {'work_item_code': 'CONC-002', 'quantity': 200, 'duration_days': 10, 'start_day': 5}, {'work_item_code': 'REBAR-003', 'quantity': 5000, 'duration_days': 8, 'start_day': 3} ] # Calculate requirements project_start = datetime(2024, 6, 1) requirements = scheduler.calculate_labor_requirements(items, project_start) # Generate schedule schedule = scheduler.generate_schedule(requirements) print(f"Total Labor Hours: {schedule.total_labor_hours:,.0f}") print(f"Peak Workers: {schedule.peak_workers}") print(f"Average Workers: {schedule.average_workers}")
python# Check if schedule can meet target leveled = scheduler.level_resources(schedule, target_workers=25)
python# Get labor loading data for charts loading_df = scheduler.generate_loading_curve(schedule)
python# See hours by trade trades = scheduler.get_trade_breakdown(schedule) print(trades)
pythongen = WeeklyScheduleGenerator(scheduler) gen.export_to_excel(schedule, "labor_schedule.xlsx")
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 35,719 | 48,554 | +36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,213 | 8,340 | +277% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 24,925 | 31,088 | +25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,098 | 8,385 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 16,055 | 20,511 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,650 | 8,736 | +139% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 20,960 | 26,475 | +26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,488 | 8,300 | +138% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 21,395 | 33,697 | +57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,789 | 10,775 | +184% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 15,560 | 14,683 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,418 | 6,539 | +170% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | 12,607 | 9,864 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,218 | 5,870 | +165% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 13,039 | 8,075 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,278 | 5,547 | +144% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 6,664 | 4,312 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,156 | 4,757 | +312% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 11,349 | 2,698 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,844 | 4,538 | +146% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 5,495 | 5,377 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 902 | 4,987 | +453% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 13,365 | 19,364 | +45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,262 | 7,582 | +235% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 11,175 | 10,054 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,148 | 5,954 | +177% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 2,564 | 3,061 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 450 | 4,543 | +910% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 9,142 | 6,027 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,610 | 5,128 | +219% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 8,553 | 5,357 | -37% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,413 | 5,116 | +262% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 8,705 | 4,710 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,398 | 4,954 | +254% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | 15,317 | 16,735 | +9% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,838 | 7,044 | +148% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 9,655 | 6,154 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,809 | 5,147 | +185% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 9,064 | 3,840 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,387 | 4,717 | +240% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | 12,914 | 2,716 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,242 | 4,473 | +100% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 8,276 | 3,334 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,540 | 4,644 | +202% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +23 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
| Model | Method | Date | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | verified | 8/22/2026 | +29% |
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.