Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Run deterministic financial models for startup valuation and SaaS health analysis. Triggered by: "/venture-capital-intelligence:financial-model", "run a financial model on X", "DCF this company", "model the financials", "calculate runway", "what is the valuation", "SaaS metrics model", "LTV CAC analysis", "unit economics", "burn rate analysis", "comparable valuation", "how long is my runway", "what's my burn multiple", "revenue projection for X", "model the ARR growth", "what is the pre-money va
.claude/skills/davepoon-financial-model/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 36% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -8% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -9% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 26% | 0% |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -22% | 0% |
You are a quantitative VC analyst. You run three valuation methods in parallel and synthesize results into a single financial picture.
Three models: (1) DCF Intrinsic Value, (2) Revenue Multiple (Comps), (3) SaaS Metrics Health Check + Runway
Pipeline: Claude collects data → Python computes all three models → Claude interprets → Python formats report
Ask the user for or extract from context:
COMPANY BASICS
Company name, sector, stage, geography
REVENUE METRICS (SaaS)
Current MRR or ARR
MRR growth rate (% month-over-month)
Net Revenue Retention (NRR) %
Gross margin %
UNIT ECONOMICS
Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) — total sales+marketing spend / new customers
Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) — monthly
Monthly churn rate %
Average customer lifetime (months, or compute as 1/churn)
BURN & RUNWAY
Current monthly burn rate
Cash on hand (current bank balance)
Last raise amount and date
PROJECTIONS (optional)
Year 1–3 revenue projections (or growth rate assumption)
Target gross margin at scale
WACC or discount rate (default: 20% for early stage)
COMPARABLES (optional)
2–3 comparable public or recently acquired companies
Their EV/Revenue multiples if knownIf data is partially available, compute what's possible and flag gaps with ⚠.
Save all inputs to ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/financial-model/output/model_inputs.json:
json{ "company": "", "stage": "", "sector": "", "mrr": 0, "arr": 0, "mrr_growth_rate": 0.0, "nrr": 0.0, "gross_margin": 0.0, "cac": 0, "arpu_monthly": 0, "monthly_churn": 0.0, "monthly_burn": 0, "cash_on_hand": 0, "discount_rate": 0.20, "terminal_growth_rate": 0.03, "projection_years": 5, "revenue_yr1": 0, "revenue_yr2": 0, "revenue_yr3": 0, "comparables": [ {"name": "", "ev_revenue_multiple": 0} ] }
Derive: if MRR is provided but ARR is not, set arr = mrr * 12. If churn is provided but lifetime is not, compute customer_lifetime = 1 / monthly_churn.
Run: python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/financial-model/scripts/financial_calc.py"
This computes:
Writes model_output.json.
Read model_output.json. Provide interpretation:
Run: python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/financial-model/scripts/report_formatter.py"
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-20 | pass→pass | 20,159 | 16,758 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,010 | 4,448 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 25,092 | 34,597 | +38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,197 | 7,371 | +42% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 22,731 | 21,600 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,375 | 5,934 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 25,536 | 19,639 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 5,636 | 5,164 | -8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 15,091 | 8,516 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,372 | 2,633 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 12,794 | 5,176 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,208 | 2,017 | -9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 11,801 | 8,876 | -25% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,126 | 2,669 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 12,799 | 10,230 | -20% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,256 | 2,893 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 14,852 | 9,525 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,516 | 2,758 | +10% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 6,897 | 3,956 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,205 | 1,720 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 6,575 | 4,725 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,164 | 1,901 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 12,611 | 9,010 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,383 | 2,767 | +16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 14,599 | 15,706 | +8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,663 | 3,813 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 14,580 | 10,028 | -31% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,321 | 2,744 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→fail | 10,298 | 6,388 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,783 | 2,251 | +26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 21,330 | 1,524 | -93% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,697 | 1,320 | -22% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 8,756 | 1,664 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,527 | 1,362 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 5,918 | 1,900 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 923 | 1,346 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 12,267 | 2,339 | -81% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,933 | 1,439 | -26% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 8,280 | 2,741 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,421 | 1,533 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 8,216 | 6,087 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,431 | 2,123 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 16,385 | 7,604 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,874 | 2,317 | -19% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +32 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.