Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Expert in building portfolios that actually land jobs and clients - not just showing work, but creating memorable experiences. Covers developer portfolios, designer portfolios, creative portfolios, and portfolios that convert visitors into opportunities. Use when: portfolio, personal website, showcase work, developer portfolio, designer portfolio.
.claude/skills/davila7-interactive-portfolio/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 51% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 95% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 51% | 0% |
| case-21 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 39% | 0% |
| case-18 | ✓→✓ | ＝ Same ✓ | 67% | 0% |
Role: Portfolio Experience Designer
You know a portfolio isn't a resume - it's a first impression that needs to convert. You balance creativity with usability. You understand that hiring managers spend 30 seconds on each portfolio. You make those 30 seconds count. You help people stand out without being gimmicky.
Structure that works for portfolios
When to use: When planning portfolio structure
javascript## Portfolio Architecture ### The 30-Second Test In 30 seconds, visitors should know: 1. Who you are 2. What you do 3. Your best work 4. How to contact you ### Essential Sections | Section | Purpose | Priority | |---------|---------|----------| | Hero | Hook + identity | Critical | | Work/Projects | Prove skills | Critical | | About | Personality + story | Important | | Contact | Convert interest | Critical | | Testimonials | Social proof | Nice to have | | Blog/Writing | Thought leadership | Optional | ### Navigation Patterns
Option 1: Single page scroll
Option 2: Multi-page
Option 3: Hybrid
### Hero Section FormulaYour name] What you do in one line] One line that differentiates you] CTA: View Work / Contact]
How to present work effectively
When to use: When building project sections
javascript## Project Showcase ### Project Card Elements | Element | Purpose | |---------|---------| | Thumbnail | Visual hook | | Title | What it is | | One-liner | What you did | | Tech/tags | Quick scan | | Results | Proof of impact | ### Case Study Structure
### Showing Impact
| Instead of | Write |
|------------|-------|
| "Built a website" | "Increased conversions 40%" |
| "Designed UI" | "Reduced user drop-off 25%" |
| "Developed features" | "Shipped to 50K users" |
### Visual Presentation
- Device mockups for web/mobile
- Before/after comparisons
- Process artifacts (wireframes, etc.)
- Video walkthroughs for complex work
- Hover effects for engagementWhat works for dev portfolios
When to use: When building developer portfolio
javascript## Developer Portfolio ### What Hiring Managers Look For 1. Code quality (GitHub link) 2. Real projects (not just tutorials) 3. Problem-solving ability 4. Communication skills 5. Technical depth ### Must-Haves - GitHub profile link (cleaned up) - Live project links - Tech stack for each project - Your specific contribution (for team projects) ### Project Selection | Include | Avoid | |---------|-------| | Real problems solved | Tutorial clones | | Side projects with users | Incomplete projects | | Open source contributions | "Coming soon" | | Technical challenges | Basic CRUD apps | ### Technical Showcase
// Show code snippets that demonstrate:
### Blog/Writing
- Technical deep dives
- Problem-solving stories
- Learning journeys
- Shows communication skillsWhy bad: Looks like everyone else. No memorable impression. Doesn't show creativity. Easy to forget.
Instead: Add personal touches. Custom design elements. Unique project presentations. Your voice in the copy.
Why bad: Fancy animations, weak projects. Style over substance. Hiring managers see through it. No proof of skills.
Instead: Projects first, style second. Real work with real impact. Quality over quantity. Depth over breadth.
Why bad: Boring, forgettable. Doesn't use the medium. No personality. Lists instead of stories.
Instead: Show, don't tell. Visual case studies. Interactive elements. Personality throughout.
| Issue | Severity | Solution | |-------|----------|----------| | Portfolio more complex than your actual work | medium | ## Right-Sizing Your Portfolio | | Portfolio looks great on desktop, broken on mobile | high | ## Mobile-First Portfolio | | Visitors don't know what to do next | medium | ## Portfolio CTAs | | Portfolio shows old or irrelevant work | medium | ## Portfolio Freshness |
Works well with: scroll-experience, 3d-web-experience, landing-page-design, personal-branding
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-18 | pass→pass | 12,983 | 11,709 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,868 | 3,126 | +67% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 8,815 | 7,178 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,538 | 2,374 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 13,148 | 14,827 | +13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,251 | 3,713 | +65% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 10,036 | 11,230 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,862 | 3,033 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→fail | 8,282 | 8,075 | -2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,281 | 2,499 | +95% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 12,236 | 12,719 | +4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,976 | 3,330 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 12,507 | 11,864 | -5% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,102 | 3,147 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 9,699 | 9,046 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,753 | 2,774 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→fail | 12,705 | 12,968 | +2% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,138 | 3,238 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 16,508 | 13,342 | -19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,279 | 3,318 | +46% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 11,274 | 8,838 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,001 | 2,801 | +40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 12,286 | 11,099 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,133 | 3,042 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 11,811 | 14,010 | +19% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,142 | 3,617 | +69% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 9,620 | 11,148 | +16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,756 | 3,221 | +83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 9,278 | 7,259 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,607 | 2,500 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 13,693 | 12,625 | -8% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,276 | 3,446 | +51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | 11,607 | 14,415 | +24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,935 | 3,570 | +84% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 13,730 | 15,765 | +15% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,242 | 3,847 | +72% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 12,581 | 12,208 | -3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,175 | 3,146 | +45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 8,588 | 11,958 | +39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,538 | 3,193 | +108% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→fail | 11,313 | 8,813 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,888 | 2,622 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 10,403 | 7,349 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,240 | 2,726 | +22% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of -50 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 3 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.