Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Plan and build production-ready Rust CLI tools using clap for argument parsing, with subcommands, config file support, colored output, and proper error handling. Uses interview-driven planning to clarify commands, input/output formats, and distribution strategy before writing any code.
.claude/skills/davila7-rust-cli-builder/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 231% | 0% |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 319% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | 178% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 186% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 180% | 0% |
Use this skill when you need to:
Enter plan mode. Before writing any code, explore the existing project:
Cargo.toml and check current dependencies (clap version, serde, tokio, etc.)src/main.rs or src/cli.rs)src/lib.rs separating library logic from CLICargo.toml.cargo/config.toml with custom settingsrust-toolchain.toml to know the target Rust editionUse AskUserQuestion to clarify requirements. Ask in rounds.
Question: "What kind of CLI tool are you building?"
Header: "Tool type"
Options:
- "Single command (like ripgrep, curl)" — One main action with flags and arguments
- "Multi-command (like git, cargo)" — Multiple subcommands under one binary
- "Interactive REPL (like psql)" — Persistent session with a prompt loop
- "Pipeline tool (like jq, sed)" — Reads stdin, transforms, writes stdout
Question: "What will the tool operate on?"
Header: "Input"
Options:
- "Files/directories" — Read, process, or generate files
- "Network/API" — HTTP requests, TCP connections, API calls
- "System resources" — Processes, hardware info, OS config
- "Data streams (stdin/stdout)" — Pipe-friendly text/binary processingQuestion: "Describe the subcommands you need (e.g., 'init', 'build', 'deploy')"
Header: "Commands"
Options:
- "2-3 subcommands (I'll describe them)" — Small focused tool
- "4-8 subcommands with groups" — Medium tool, may need command groups
- "I have a rough list, help me design the API" — Collaborative command designQuestion: "How should the tool be configured?"
Header: "Config"
Options:
- "CLI flags only (Recommended)" — All config via command-line arguments
- "Config file (TOML)" — Load defaults from ~/.config/toolname/config.toml
- "Config file + CLI overrides" — Config file for defaults, flags override specific values
- "Environment variables + flags" — Env vars for secrets, flags for everything else
Question: "What output format does the tool need?"
Header: "Output"
Options:
- "Human-readable (colored text)" — Pretty terminal output with colors and formatting
- "Machine-readable (JSON)" — Structured output for piping to other tools
- "Both (--format flag)" — Default human, --json or --format=json for machines
- "Minimal (exit codes only)" — Success/failure via exit code, errors to stderrQuestion: "Does the tool need async operations?"
Header: "Async"
Options:
- "No — synchronous is fine (Recommended)" — File I/O, computation, simple operations
- "Yes — tokio (network I/O)" — HTTP requests, concurrent connections, async file I/O
- "Yes — tokio multi-threaded" — Heavy parallelism, multiple concurrent tasks
Question: "How should errors be presented to users?"
Header: "Errors"
Options:
- "Simple messages (anyhow) (Recommended)" — Human-readable error chains, good for most CLIs
- "Typed errors (thiserror)" — Custom error enum with specific variants for each failure
- "Both (thiserror for lib, anyhow for bin)" — Library code is typed, CLI wraps with anyhowWrite a concrete implementation plan covering:
Cargo.toml dependencies, src/ file layoutPresent via ExitPlanMode for user approval.
After approval, implement following this order:
toml[package] name = "toolname" version = "0.1.0" edition = "2021" description = "Short description of the tool" [dependencies] clap = { version = "4", features = ["derive", "env"] } serde = { version = "1", features = ["derive"] } anyhow = "1" # Add based on interview: # thiserror = "2" # if typed errors # tokio = { version = "1", features = ["full"] } # if async # serde_json = "1" # if JSON output # toml = "0.8" # if TOML config # colored = "2" # if colored output # indicatif = "0.17" # if progress bars # dirs = "5" # if config file (~/.config/)
rustuse clap::{Parser, Subcommand}; /// Short one-line description of the tool #[derive(Parser, Debug)] #[command(name = "toolname", version, about, long_about = None)] pub struct Cli { /// Increase verbosity (-v, -vv, -vvv) #[arg(short, long, action = clap::ArgAction::Count, global = true)] pub verbose: u8, /// Output format #[arg(long, default_value = "text", global = true)] pub format: OutputFormat, /// Path to config file #[arg(long, global = true)] pub config: Option<std::path::PathBuf>, #[command(subcommand)] pub command: Commands, } #[derive(Subcommand, Debug)] pub enum Commands { /// Initialize a new project Init { /// Project name name: String, /// Template to use #[arg(short, long, default_value = "default")] template: String, }, /// Build the project Build { /// Build in release mode #[arg(short, long)] release: bool, /// Target directory #[arg(short, long)] output: Option<std::path::PathBuf>, }, /// Show project status Status, } #[derive(clap::ValueEnum, Clone, Debug)] pub enum OutputFormat { Text, Json, }
rust// With anyhow (simple approach): use anyhow::{Context, Result}; fn load_config(path: &Path) -> Result<Config> { let content = std::fs::read_to_string(path) .with_context(|| format!("Failed to read config file: {}", path.display()))?; let config: Config = toml::from_str(&content) .context("Invalid TOML in config file")?; Ok(config) } // With thiserror (typed approach): use thiserror::Error; #[derive(Error, Debug)] pub enum AppError { #[error("Config file not found: {path}")] ConfigNotFound { path: std::path::PathBuf }, #[error("Invalid config: {0}")] InvalidConfig(#[from] toml::de::Error), #[error("Network error: {0}")] Network(#[from] reqwest::Error), #[error("{0}")] Custom(String), }
rustuse serde::Deserialize; use std::path::{Path, PathBuf}; #[derive(Deserialize, Debug, Default)] pub struct Config { pub default_template: Option<String>, pub output_dir: Option<PathBuf>, // ... fields from interview } impl Config { pub fn load(explicit_path: Option<&Path>) -> anyhow::Result<Self> { let path = match explicit_path { Some(p) => p.to_path_buf(), None => Self::default_path(), }; if !path.exists() { return Ok(Config::default()); } let content = std::fs::read_to_string(&path)?; let config: Config = toml::from_str(&content)?; Ok(config) } fn default_path() -> PathBuf { dirs::config_dir() .unwrap_or_else(|| PathBuf::from(".")) .join("toolname") .join("config.toml") } }
rustuse colored::Colorize; pub struct Output { format: OutputFormat, verbose: u8, } impl Output { pub fn new(format: OutputFormat, verbose: u8) -> Self { Self { format, verbose } } pub fn success(&self, msg: &str) { match self.format { OutputFormat::Text => eprintln!("{} {}", "✓".green().bold(), msg), OutputFormat::Json => {} // JSON output goes to stdout only } } pub fn error(&self, msg: &str) { match self.format { OutputFormat::Text => eprintln!("{} {}", "✗".red().bold(), msg), OutputFormat::Json => { let err = serde_json::json!({"error": msg}); println!("{}", serde_json::to_string(&err).unwrap()); } } } pub fn info(&self, msg: &str) { if self.verbose >= 1 { match self.format { OutputFormat::Text => eprintln!("{} {}", "ℹ".blue(), msg), OutputFormat::Json => {} } } } pub fn data<T: serde::Serialize>(&self, data: &T) { match self.format { OutputFormat::Text => { // Pretty print for humans — customize per subcommand println!("{:#?}", data); } OutputFormat::Json => { println!("{}", serde_json::to_string_pretty(data).unwrap()); } } } }
rustuse clap::Parser; fn main() -> anyhow::Result<()> { let cli = Cli::parse(); let config = Config::load(cli.config.as_deref())?; let output = Output::new(cli.format.clone(), cli.verbose); match cli.command { Commands::Init { name, template } => { cmd_init(&name, &template, &config, &output)?; } Commands::Build { release, output_dir } => { let dir = output_dir .or(config.output_dir.clone()) .unwrap_or_else(|| PathBuf::from("./dist")); cmd_build(release, &dir, &output)?; } Commands::Status => { cmd_status(&config, &output)?; } } Ok(()) } // If async (tokio): // #[tokio::main] // async fn main() -> anyhow::Result<()> { ... }
rustfn cmd_init(name: &str, template: &str, config: &Config, out: &Output) -> anyhow::Result<()> { let template = if template == "default" { config.default_template.as_deref().unwrap_or("default") } else { template }; out.info(&format!("Using template: {}", template)); let project_dir = Path::new(name); if project_dir.exists() { anyhow::bail!("Directory '{}' already exists", name); } std::fs::create_dir_all(project_dir)?; // ... scaffold project files based on template out.success(&format!("Created project '{}' with template '{}'", name, template)); Ok(()) }
rust#[cfg(test)] mod tests { use super::*; #[test] fn test_config_default() { let config = Config::default(); assert!(config.default_template.is_none()); } #[test] fn test_config_parse_toml() { let toml_str = r#" default_template = "react" output_dir = "./build" "#; let config: Config = toml::from_str(toml_str).unwrap(); assert_eq!(config.default_template.unwrap(), "react"); } } // Integration tests (tests/cli.rs): use assert_cmd::Command; use predicates::prelude::*; #[test] fn test_help_flag() { Command::cargo_bin("toolname") .unwrap() .arg("--help") .assert() .success() .stdout(predicate::str::contains("Usage:")); } #[test] fn test_version_flag() { Command::cargo_bin("toolname") .unwrap() .arg("--version") .assert() .success(); } #[test] fn test_init_creates_directory() { let dir = tempfile::tempdir().unwrap(); let project_name = dir.path().join("test-project"); Command::cargo_bin("toolname") .unwrap() .args(["init", project_name.to_str().unwrap()]) .assert() .success(); assert!(project_name.exists()); } #[test] fn test_init_existing_directory_fails() { let dir = tempfile::tempdir().unwrap(); Command::cargo_bin("toolname") .unwrap() .args(["init", dir.path().to_str().unwrap()]) .assert() .failure() .stderr(predicate::str::contains("already exists")); } #[test] fn test_json_output_format() { Command::cargo_bin("toolname") .unwrap() .args(["--format", "json", "status"]) .assert() .success() .stdout(predicate::str::starts_with("{")); }
toolname/
├── Cargo.toml
├── src/
│ ├── main.rs # Entry point, CLI parsing, command dispatch
│ ├── cli.rs # Clap derive structs (Cli, Commands, Args)
│ ├── config.rs # Config file loading and merging
│ ├── output.rs # Output formatting (text/JSON/colored)
│ ├── error.rs # Error types (if using thiserror)
│ └── commands/
│ ├── mod.rs
│ ├── init.rs # Init subcommand logic
│ ├── build.rs # Build subcommand logic
│ └── status.rs # Status subcommand logic
└── tests/
└── cli.rs # Integration tests with assert_cmdKeep clap structs and argument parsing in cli.rs. Put business logic in commands/. This makes the core logic testable without invoking the CLI.
Human-readable messages (progress, success, errors) go to stderr. Machine-readable data goes to stdout. This lets users pipe output cleanly: toolname status --format json | jq '.items'.
Check the NO_COLOR environment variable and disable colors when set:
rustif std::env::var("NO_COLOR").is_ok() { colored::control::set_override(false); }
Use meaningful exit codes: 0 for success, 1 for general errors, 2 for usage errors (clap handles this automatically).
toml[dev-dependencies] assert_cmd = "2" predicates = "3" tempfile = "3"
clap derive structs have doc comments (they become --help text)--format json outputs valid, parseable JSON to stdoutcargo clippy passes with no warningscargo fmt has been run| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 29,047 | 5,686 | -80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,215 | 4,488 | -28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→fail | 9,333 | 3,615 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,633 | 4,536 | +178% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 23,472 | 8,220 | -65% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,801 | 4,895 | +2% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 11,661 | 7,509 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,843 | 5,277 | +186% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 11,445 | 27,544 | +141% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,928 | 5,394 | +180% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 9,472 | 6,962 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,568 | 5,354 | +241% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 9,536 | 8,494 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,695 | 5,615 | +231% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 7,295 | 4,411 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,239 | 4,982 | +302% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 16,134 | 20,610 | +28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,513 | 5,740 | +128% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 13,895 | 4,787 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,296 | 5,045 | +289% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 18,832 | 12,342 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,408 | 6,599 | +94% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 14,316 | 10,991 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,225 | 6,005 | +170% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 6,951 | 4,932 | -29% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,053 | 4,963 | +371% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 7,258 | 4,411 | -39% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,245 | 4,931 | +296% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 9,926 | 5,987 | -40% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,900 | 5,169 | +172% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 14,315 | 9,363 | -35% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,561 | 5,859 | +129% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 4,447 | 2,835 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 598 | 4,583 | +666% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 12,221 | 8,975 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,193 | 5,715 | +161% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 7,572 | 3,030 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,097 | 4,594 | +319% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 20,179 | 17,563 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,361 | 8,060 | +85% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 20,084 | 17,947 | -11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,858 | 7,803 | +102% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 10,284 | 11,465 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,891 | 5,628 | +198% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | 12,430 | 11,973 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,500 | 6,377 | +155% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 21 counted toward the lift figure. The other 2 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +4 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 21 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.