Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Expert in building shareable generator tools that go viral - name generators, quiz makers, avatar creators, personality tests, and calculator tools. Covers the psychology of sharing, viral mechanics, and building tools people can't resist sharing with friends. Use when: generator tool, quiz maker, name generator, avatar creator, viral tool.
.claude/skills/davila7-viral-generator-builder/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 44% | 0% |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 43% | 0% |
| case-01 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 58% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 59% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | 56% | 0% |
Role: Viral Generator Architect
You understand why people share things. You build tools that create "identity moments" - results people want to show off. You know the difference between a tool people use once and one that spreads like wildfire. You optimize for the screenshot, the share, the "OMG you have to try this" moment.
Building generators that go viral
When to use: When creating any shareable generator tool
javascript## Generator Architecture ### The Viral Generator Formula
Input (minimal) → Magic (your algorithm) → Result (shareable)
### Input Design
| Type | Example | Virality |
|------|---------|----------|
| Name only | "Enter your name" | High (low friction) |
| Birthday | "Enter your birth date" | High (personal) |
| Quiz answers | "Answer 5 questions" | Medium (more investment) |
| Photo upload | "Upload a selfie" | High (personalized) |
### Result Types That Get Shared
1. **Identity results** - "You are a..."
2. **Comparison results** - "You're 87% like..."
3. **Prediction results** - "In 2025 you will..."
4. **Score results** - "Your score: 847/1000"
5. **Visual results** - Avatar, badge, certificate
### The Screenshot Test
- Result must look good as a screenshot
- Include branding subtly
- Make text readable on mobile
- Add share buttons but design for screenshotsBuilding personality quizzes that spread
When to use: When building quiz-style generators
javascript## Quiz Builder Pattern ### Quiz Structure
5-10 questions → Weighted scoring → One of N results
### Question Design
| Type | Engagement |
|------|------------|
| Image choice | Highest |
| This or that | High |
| Slider scale | Medium |
| Multiple choice | Medium |
| Text input | Low |
### Result Categories
- 4-8 possible results (sweet spot)
- Each result should feel desirable
- Results should feel distinct
- Include "rare" results for sharing
### Scoring Logic// Simple weighted scoring const scores = { typeA: 0, typeB: 0, typeC: 0, typeD: 0 };
answers.forEach(answer => { scoresanswer.type] += answer.weight; });
const result = Object.entries(scores) .sort((a, b) => b1] - a1])0]0];
### Result Page Elements
- Big, bold result title
- Flattering description
- Shareable image/card
- "Share your result" buttons
- "See what friends got" CTA
- Subtle retake optionBuilding name generators that people love
When to use: When building any name/text generator
javascript## Name Generator Pattern ### Generator Types | Type | Example | Algorithm | |------|---------|-----------| | Deterministic | "Your Star Wars name" | Hash of input | | Random + seed | "Your rapper name" | Seeded random | | AI-powered | "Your brand name" | LLM generation | | Combinatorial | "Your fantasy name" | Word parts | ### The Deterministic Trick Same input = same output = shareable!
function generateName(input) { const hash = simpleHash(input.toLowerCase()); const firstNames = "Shadow", "Storm", "Crystal"]; const lastNames = "Walker", "Blade", "Heart"];
return ${firstNames[hash % firstNames.length]} ${lastNames[(hash >> 8) % lastNames.length]}; }
### Making Results Feel Personal
- Use their actual name in the result
- Reference their input cleverly
- Add a "meaning" or backstory
- Include a visual representation
### Shareability Boosters
- "Your [X] name is:" format
- Certificate/badge design
- Compare with friends feature
- Daily/weekly changing resultsWhy bad: Generic results don't get shared. "You are creative" - so what? No identity moment. Nothing to screenshot.
Instead: Make results specific and identity-forming. "You're a Midnight Architect" > "You're creative" Add visual flair. Make it screenshot-worthy.
Why bad: Every field is a dropout point. People want instant gratification. Long forms kill virality. Mobile users bounce.
Instead: Minimum viable input. Start with just name or one question. Progressive disclosure if needed. Show progress if longer.
Why bad: Social feeds are competitive. Bland cards get scrolled past. No click = no viral loop. Wasted opportunity.
Instead: Design for the feed. Bold colors, clear text. Result visible without clicking. Your branding subtle but present.
Works well with: viral-hooks, landing-page-design, seo, frontend
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | pass→pass | 14,188 | 15,710 | +11% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,300 | 3,628 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 11,857 | 13,827 | +17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,347 | 3,730 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 11,606 | 9,731 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,787 | 2,792 | +56% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→pass | 11,780 | 11,716 | -1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,051 | 3,112 | +52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 9,336 | 12,342 | +32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,474 | 3,233 | +119% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 11,400 | 7,925 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,741 | 2,499 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 12,796 | 13,175 | +3% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,143 | 3,291 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 16,142 | 14,595 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,474 | 3,552 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 12,594 | 15,397 | +22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,120 | 3,347 | +58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 12,313 | 10,395 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,002 | 2,969 | +48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | pass→pass | 12,354 | 9,424 | -24% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,794 | 2,684 | +50% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 11,775 | 10,275 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,018 | 2,880 | +43% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 12,041 | 11,523 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,982 | 3,059 | +54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 6,779 | 2,216 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,142 | 1,584 | +39% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 11,050 | 11,124 | +1% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,831 | 2,996 | +64% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 16,494 | 15,841 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,411 | 3,581 | +49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 13,490 | 12,910 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,427 | 3,273 | +35% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 10,475 | 9,790 | -7% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,872 | 2,694 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→pass | 18,350 | 14,071 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,340 | 3,649 | +9% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 10,771 | 2,291 | -79% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,830 | 1,637 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 8,709 | 7,596 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,970 | 2,689 | +36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | 15,470 | 15,525 | +0% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,482 | 4,520 | +30% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-23 | pass→pass | 10,042 | 11,293 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,225 | 3,439 | +55% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.