Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Detect process hollowing (T1055.012) by analyzing memory-mapped sections, hollowed process indicators, and parent-child process anomalies in EDR telemetry.
.claude/skills/detecting-process-hollowing-technique/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | T1055.012 | Process Injection: Process Hollowing | | T1055 | Process Injection (parent technique) | | T1055.001 | DLL Injection | | T1055.003 | Thread Execution Hijacking | | T1055.004 | Asynchronous Procedure Call | | CREATE_SUSPENDED | Windows flag to create a process in suspended state | | NtUnmapViewOfSection | API to unmap process memory sections | | WriteProcessMemory | API to write into another process's memory | | ResumeThread | API to resume a suspended thread | | Image Mismatch | Process memory content differs from on-disk binary | | Process Doppelganging | Related technique using NTFS transactions (T1055.013) |
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | CrowdStrike Falcon | Memory protection and hollowing detection | | Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | ProcessTampering alerts | | Sysmon v13+ | Event ID 25 ProcessTampering detection | | Volatility | Memory forensics - malfind plugin | | pe-sieve | Process memory scanner for hollowed processes | | Hollows Hunter | Automated hollowed process detection | | Process Hacker | Live process memory inspection | | API Monitor | Monitor NtUnmapViewOfSection calls |
Hunt ID: TH-HOLLOW-[DATE]-[SEQ]
Technique: T1055.012
Hollowed Process: [Process name and PID]
Original Binary: [Expected on-disk path]
Parent Process: [Parent name and PID]
Memory Mismatch: [Yes/No]
Suspicious APIs: [NtUnmapViewOfSection, WriteProcessMemory, etc.]
Network Activity: [C2 connections if any]
Host: [Hostname]
User: [Account context]
Risk Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +22 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.