Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Memory Sync Skill
.claude/skills/dicklesworthstone-memory-sync/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -11% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 1% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -24% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -36% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -37% | 0% |
How to manually sync learnings to memory systems after tasks.
Ariff uses two complementary memory systems:
Use mcp__mem0-memory-mcp__add_memory to store:
- Task context and solution
- Key learnings and gotchas
- Useful commands discoveredUse mcp__obsidian-memory__create_note with:
- path: "tasks/YYYY-MM-DD-task-slug.md"
- content: Structured task notesmarkdown## Task: [Brief Title] Date: [YYYY-MM-DD] Device: [hostname] ### Problem [What was the issue/request] ### Solution [How it was resolved] ### Key Learnings - [Learning 1] - [Learning 2] ### Related - Previous tasks: [links] - Documentation: [links]
When a mistake or pattern should be avoided in future:
Ariff-code-config/instructions/[category]-[topic].instructions.md
markdown --- description: What this instruction prevents/ensures] applyTo: glob pattern like /.py or /canvas/] ---
# Rule Title]
## Context When this applies]
## Rule What to do/not do]
## Example Good vs bad example]
If memories seem out of sync:
Save memory when:
Skip saving when:
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 20,161 | 15,428 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,478 | 2,908 | +17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | 6,607 | 9,796 | +48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 200 | 968 | +384% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | 17,541 | 8,236 | -53% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,104 | 975 | -54% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 9,992 | 2,706 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,350 | 1,025 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 12,960 | 7,267 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,738 | 1,551 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 11,669 | 4,623 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,579 | 1,271 | -20% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 9,905 | 5,668 | -43% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,409 | 1,418 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | 12,262 | 18,082 | +47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,813 | 892 | -51% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 15,281 | 7,039 | -54% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,182 | 1,652 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 16,677 | 7,479 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,796 | 1,776 | -36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 10,511 | 4,781 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,793 | 1,129 | -37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 8,844 | 2,734 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,305 | 884 | -32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 3,457 | 3,855 | +12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 509 | 1,227 | +141% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | 10,356 | 3,498 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,795 | 1,149 | -36% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→pass | 9,891 | 5,326 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,656 | 1,453 | -12% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 6,101 | 4,015 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 700 | 1,116 | +59% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 10,448 | 5,375 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,475 | 1,413 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 16,457 | 14,819 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,851 | 2,694 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 12,527 | 6,044 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,180 | 1,598 | -27% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 10,448 | 4,427 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,720 | 1,152 | -33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 3,177 | 5,121 | +61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 489 | 1,380 | +182% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 6,030 | 1,897 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 967 | 856 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 19 counted toward the lift figure. The other 3 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +41 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 19 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.