Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →dicklesworthstone/specs-dev
Plan-first development workflow with review gates.
Passed 18 of 21 test cases with the skill, and 7 of 21 without it.
and 11 more in the full report
13 fixed7 passed either way2 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 13 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
What template path should be referenced when creating the initial tactical breakdown file during Phase 2?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response specifies references/templates/tasks.md. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
A disciplined, review-gated development workflow ensuring quality through structured planning and iterative implementation.
| Phase | Purpose | Exit Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Discovery | Understand requirements | User approves summary |
| 2. Planning | Create reviewed plan | Plan reviewed and approved |
| 3. Implementation | Iterative coding with reviews | All tasks complete, reviewed |
| 4. Completion | Final validation | Tests pass, docs updated |
Goal: Reach shared understanding before planning.
Gate A: "Do I understand correctly? Should I proceed to create the plan?" — Wait for approval.
Goal: Create a comprehensive, reviewed implementation plan.
references/templates/plan.mdreferences/agents/reviewer.mdtest cases passed, vs 7 / 21 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.