Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Template-native research intake, literature search, source verification, synthesis, fact-checking, and systematic-review planning. USE WHEN the user asks to research a topic, build a literature corpus, fact-check claims, prepare a PRISMA-style review, or clarify a research question before manuscript work.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -40% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 3% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -59% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -20% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -41% | 0% |
Template-native research workflow. This skill routes to existing repository systems instead of running an autonomous external agent suite.
docs/_generated/active_projects.md.infrastructure.search.literature and project-local corpora; record query, backend, date, DOI/arXiv IDs, and failures.fabricated/mismatch records, surface unverifiable/unchecked honestly, and never invent unavailable bibliographic fields. This is the tier-0 anti-leakage step: flag the gap, do not hallucinate the citation.bashuv run python -m infrastructure.search.literature search "QUERY" --max-results 20 uv run python -m infrastructure.reference.citation validate projects/<project>/manuscript/references.bib uv run python -m infrastructure.reference.verification verify projects/<project>/manuscript/references.bib --live --json uv run python -m infrastructure.validation.cli evidence projects/<project> --fail-on-issues
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.