Loading skill
Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →dokhacgiakhoa/comprehensive-review-full-review
Use when working with comprehensive review full review
Passed 18 of 23 test cases with the skill, and 6 of 23 without it.
and 9 more in the full report
12 fixed6 passed either way5 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 12 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
The automated review flagged minor typo corrections in code comments and stylistic variable naming suggestions. Which priority tier should track these?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Classifies minor documentation typos and stylistic suggestions under P3 priority. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
resources/implementation-playbook.md.Orchestrate comprehensive multi-dimensional code review using specialized review agents
[Extended thinking: This workflow performs an exhaustive code review by orchestrating multiple specialized agents in sequential phases. Each phase builds upon previous findings to create a comprehensive review that covers code quality, security, performance, testing, documentation, and best practices. The workflow integrates modern AI-assisted review tools, static analysis, security scanning, and automated quality metrics. Results are consolidated into actionable feedback with clear prioritization and remediation guidance. The phased approach ensures thorough coverage while maintaining efficiency through parallel agent execution where appropriate.]
Use Task tool to orchestrate quality and architecture agents in parallel:
test cases passed, vs 6 / 23 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.