Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Search arXiv preprint repository for papers in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, and related fields.
.claude/skills/dougtrajano-arxiv-search/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 18% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -82% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -74% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -79% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✓→✗ | ▼ Worse | -84% | 0% |
This skill provides access to arXiv, a free distribution service and open-access archive for scholarly articles in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering, systems science, and economics.
Use this skill when you need to:
The arxiv_search script accepts the following arguments:
query (required): Search query string (e.g., "neural networks protein structure", "single cell RNA-seq")max-papers (optional): Maximum number of papers to retrieve (default: 10)Search for computational biology papers (default 10 results):
Search for machine learning papers with limited results:
General search with custom limit:
The script returns formatted results with:
This script requires the arxiv package, which should be installed in your environment.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | 17,312 | 5,119 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,309 | 568 | -83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→fail | 15,897 | 4,955 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,075 | 553 | -82% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | pass→fail | 13,375 | 5,627 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,261 | 583 | -74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 14,324 | 13,484 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,011 | 2,784 | -8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | 8,903 | 17,580 | +97% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,575 | 3,528 | +124% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 4,962 | 3,488 | -30% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 656 | 776 | +18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | 14,552 | 5,236 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,748 | 561 | -80% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→fail | 12,534 | 8,962 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,326 | 483 | -79% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→fail | 16,677 | 4,847 | -71% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,891 | 455 | -84% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | 7,655 | 7,175 | -6% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 381 | 489 | +28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 16,338 | 4,961 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,189 | 526 | -76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→fail | 14,211 | 5,706 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,246 | 570 | -75% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | 19,292 | 6,008 | -69% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,678 | 561 | -85% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | pass→fail | 11,866 | 5,725 | -52% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,956 | 501 | -74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→fail | 21,515 | 6,815 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,936 | 548 | -81% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→fail | 23,014 | 4,502 | -80% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,977 | 513 | -87% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→fail | 21,649 | 5,712 | -74% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,170 | 538 | -83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→fail | 14,229 | 5,314 | -63% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,223 | 484 | -78% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→fail | 19,739 | 5,320 | -73% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,161 | 474 | -89% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→fail | 17,790 | 8,054 | -55% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,971 | 500 | -83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→fail | 12,605 | 11,093 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,089 | 895 | -57% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→fail | 17,363 | 9,488 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,309 | 458 | -80% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 3 counted toward the lift figure. The other 19 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of -59 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 3 comparable cases. 17 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.