Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Guide users through ECC's current agents, skills, commands, hooks, rules, install profiles, and project onboarding by reading the live repository surface before answering.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-21 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-22 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Use this skill when a user needs help understanding, navigating, installing, or choosing parts of Everything Claude Code.
Use this skill when the user:
Answer from current files, not memory. ECC changes quickly, so hard-coded catalog counts, feature lists, and install instructions go stale.
When the ECC repository is available, inspect the relevant files before giving a concrete answer:
bashnode scripts/ci/catalog.js --json find skills -maxdepth 2 -name SKILL.md | sort find commands -maxdepth 1 -name '*.md' | sort find agents -maxdepth 1 -name '*.md' | sort node scripts/install-plan.js --list-profiles node scripts/install-plan.js --list-components --json
Use the smallest set of reads needed for the user's question.
README.md: install paths, uninstall/reset guidance, public positioning, FAQsAGENTS.md: contributor guidance and project structureagent.yaml: exported gitagent surface and command listcommands/: maintained slash-command compatibility shimsskills/*/SKILL.md: reusable workflows and domain playbooksagents/*.md: delegated subagent role promptsrules/: language and harness ruleshooks/README.md, hooks/hooks.json, scripts/hooks/: hook behavior and safety gatesmanifests/install-*.json: selective install modules, components, profiles, and target supportdocs/: harness guides, architecture notes, translated docs, release docsLead with the answer, then give the next action. Most users do not need a full catalog dump.
Good first response shape:
Avoid:
Give a short menu:
Point to README.md for install/reset and /project-init for project-specific onboarding.
For "what should I use for X?":
skills/, commands/, and agents/.Useful searches:
bashrg -n "<query>" skills commands agents docs find skills -maxdepth 2 -name SKILL.md | sort
Use managed install paths:
bashnode scripts/install-plan.js --list-profiles node scripts/install-plan.js --profile minimal --target claude --json node scripts/install-apply.js --profile minimal --target claude --dry-run
For specific skill installs:
bashnode scripts/install-plan.js --skills <skill-id> --target claude --json node scripts/install-apply.js --skills <skill-id> --target claude --dry-run
Warn users not to stack plugin installs and full manual/profile installs unless they intentionally want duplicate surfaces.
Use /project-init when the user wants ECC configured for a target repo. The expected sequence is:
CLAUDE.md and settings filesAsk for the target harness and install path first, then inspect:
.claude/, .cursor/, .codex/, .gemini/, .opencode/, .codebuddy/, .joycode/, or .qwen/hooks/hooks.jsonFor repo health, suggest:
bashnpm run harness:audit -- --format text npm run observability:ready npm test
textUse <skill-or-command>. It fits because <reason>. Canonical file: <path> Verify with: <command> Next: <one concrete action>
textBest matches: - <path>: <why it matters> - <path>: <why it matters> Recommendation: <which one to use first and why>
textDetected: <stack evidence> Target: <harness> Plan: <profile/modules/skills> Dry run: <command> Would change: <paths> Needs approval before apply: <yes/no>
/project-init: stack-aware onboarding plan for a target repo/harness-audit: deterministic readiness scorecard/skill-health: skill quality review/skill-create: generate a new skill from local git history/security-scan: inspect Claude/OpenCode configuration security| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 15 counted toward the lift figure. The other 7 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +55 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 15 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.