Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Access European Nucleotide Archive via API/FTP. Retrieve DNA/RNA sequences, raw reads (FASTQ), genome assemblies by accession, for genomics and bioinformatics pipelines. Supports multiple formats.
.claude/skills/ena-database/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-18 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-07 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-08 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
The European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) is a comprehensive public repository for nucleotide sequence data and associated metadata. Access and query DNA/RNA sequences, raw reads, genome assemblies, and functional annotations through REST APIs and FTP for genomics and bioinformatics pipelines.
This skill should be used when:
ENA organizes data into hierarchical object types:
Studies/Projects - Group related data and control release dates. Studies are the primary unit for citing archived data.
Samples - Represent units of biomaterial from which sequencing libraries were produced. Samples must be registered before submitting most data types.
Raw Reads - Consist of:
Assemblies - Genome, transcriptome, metagenome, or metatranscriptome assemblies at various completion levels.
Sequences - Assembled and annotated sequences stored in the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database, including coding/non-coding regions and functional annotations.
Analyses - Results from computational analyses of sequence data.
Taxonomy Records - Taxonomic information including lineage and rank.
ENA provides multiple REST APIs for data access. Consult references/api_reference.md for detailed endpoint documentation.
Key APIs:
ENA Portal API - Advanced search functionality across all ENA data types
ENA Browser API - Direct retrieval of records and metadata
ENA Taxonomy REST API - Query taxonomic information
ENA Cross Reference Service - Access related records from external databases
CRAM Reference Registry - Retrieve reference sequences
Rate Limiting: All APIs have a rate limit of 50 requests per second. Exceeding this returns HTTP 429 (Too Many Requests).
Browser-Based Search:
Programmatic Queries:
Example API Query Pattern:
pythonimport requests # Search for samples from a specific study base_url = "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/portal/api/search" params = { "result": "sample", "query": "study_accession=PRJEB1234", "format": "json", "limit": 100 } response = requests.get(base_url, params=params) samples = response.json()
Metadata Formats:
Sequence Data:
Download Methods:
Retrieve raw sequencing reads by accession:
python# Download run files using Browser API accession = "ERR123456" url = f"https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/api/xml/{accession}"
Search for all samples in a study:
python# Use Portal API to list samples study_id = "PRJNA123456" url = f"https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/portal/api/search?result=sample&query=study_accession={study_id}&format=tsv"
Find assemblies for a specific organism:
python# Search assemblies by taxonomy organism = "Escherichia coli" url = f"https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/portal/api/search?result=assembly&query=tax_tree({organism})&format=json"
Get taxonomic lineage:
python# Query taxonomy API taxon_id = "562" # E. coli url = f"https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/taxonomy/rest/tax-id/{taxon_id}"
Bulk Download Pattern:
BLAST Integration: Integrate with EBI's NCBI BLAST service (REST/SOAP API) for sequence similarity searches against ENA sequences.
Rate Limiting:
Data Citation:
API Response Handling:
Performance:
This skill includes detailed reference documentation for working with ENA:
api_reference.md - Comprehensive API endpoint documentation including:
Load this reference when constructing complex API queries, debugging API responses, or needing specific parameter details.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted, and 22 counted toward the lift figure. The other 1 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +13 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.