See it in action
One of 2 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
PromptI executed the verification suite for `notification_worker.rb`. What status breakdown must be present in the report summary?
What was checked, without and with the skill| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|
| Itemize what passed and what failed or remains unverified. | Missed | Passed |
|---|
What's inside
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
SKILL.md36 linessingle file
Dev Verify
Derived from oh-my-claudecode (MIT, Yeachan Heo). Adapted for the EvoNexus Engineering Layer.
Use this skill when the user wants confidence that a feature, fix, or refactor actually works.
Goal
Turn vague "it should work" claims into concrete evidence.
Workflow
- Identify the exact behavior that must be proven.
- Prefer existing tests first.
- If coverage is missing, run the narrowest direct verification commands available.
- If direct automation is not enough, describe the manual validation steps and gather concrete observable evidence.
- Report only what was actually verified.
Verification order
- Existing tests
- Typecheck / build
- Narrow direct command checks
- Manual or interactive validation
Rules
- Do not say a change is complete without evidence.
- If a check fails, include the failure clearly.
- If no realistic verification path exists, say that explicitly instead of bluffing.
- Prefer concise evidence summaries over noisy logs.
Output
- What was verified
- Which commands/tests were run
- What passed
- What failed or remains unverified
When to delegate
For deeper verification with formal acceptance criteria mapping, delegate to @oath-verifier.
Track record
Benchmark
13 / 20
test cases passed, vs 14 / 20 without
Adoption
- Users
- 0
- Times used
- 0
Safety and source details
SkillSafety
✓ 3 of 3 passed✓Code scan15 of 15 checks clean
0 critical · 0 warning · 0 info — scanner v4 — 8/3/2026
View 15 scanner checks
live_secretremote_code_executionreverse_shelldata_exfiltrationssrf_metadataagent_snoopinganti_refusaldestructive_commandsobfuscated_unicodeunicode_homoglyphopaque_blobsuspicious_urltool_overreachtrigger_abuseprompt_injection_phrasing
✓IntentSafe
LLM judge · does the skill do what it claims
✓ContentClean
LLM judge · policy & harmful-content review
Source
Importedevolution-foundation / evo-nexus
.claude/skills/dev-verify/SKILL.md
View on GitHub ↗License NOASSERTIONImported 8/3/2026Version v1