Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Document analysis with inline source screenshots. When you ask Copilot to analyze a document, Eyeball generates a Word doc where every factual claim includes a highlighted screenshot from the source material so you can verify it with your own eyes.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-13 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-14 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-17 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-12 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
Analyze documents with visual proof. When activated, Eyeball produces a Word document on the user's Desktop where every factual assertion includes an inline screenshot from the source material with the cited text highlighted in yellow.
When the user invokes this skill (e.g., "use eyeball", "run eyeball on this", "eyeball this document"), respond with:
> Eyeball is active. I'll analyze the document and produce a Word doc with inline source screenshots so you can verify every claim with your own eyes.
Then follow the workflow below.
The Eyeball Python utility is located at:
<plugin_dir>/skills/eyeball/tools/eyeball.pyTo find the actual path, run:
bashfind ~/.copilot/installed-plugins -name "eyeball.py" -path "*/eyeball/*" 2>/dev/null
If not found there, check the project directory or the user's home directory for the eyeball repo.
Before first use, check that dependencies are installed:
bashpython3 <path-to>/eyeball.py setup-check
If anything is missing, install the required dependencies:
bashpip3 install pymupdf pillow python-docx playwright python3 -m playwright install chromium
On Windows, also install pywin32 for Word automation:
bashpip install pywin32
Follow these steps exactly. The order matters.
Before writing any analysis, extract and read the full text of the source document:
bashpython3 <path-to>/eyeball.py extract-text --source "<path-or-url>"
Read the output carefully. Identify actual section numbers, headings, page numbers, and key language.
CRITICAL: Do not skip this step. Do not write analysis based on assumptions about how the document is structured. Read the actual text.
For each point in your analysis, you must:
This is the most important step. Anchors determine what gets highlighted in the screenshots.
DO:
DO NOT:
Examples:
WRONG -- uses a generic topic label that matches everywhere:
json{"anchors": ["User-Generated Content"], "target_page": 8}
RIGHT -- uses the specific language that supports the claim:
json{"anchors": ["retain ownership", "Ownership of Content, Right to Post"], "target_page": 8}
WRONG -- section title appears as a cross-reference on earlier pages:
json{"anchors": ["LIMITATION OF LIABILITY"]}
RIGHT -- includes the section number for precision, targets the correct page:
json{"anchors": ["12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY", "INDIRECT", "CONSEQUENTIAL"], "target_page": 13}
Construct a JSON array of sections and call the build command:
bashpython3 <path-to>/eyeball.py build \ --source "<path-or-url>" \ --output ~/Desktop/<title>.docx \ --title "Analysis Title" \ --subtitle "Source description" \ --sections '[ { "heading": "1. Section Title", "analysis": "Your analysis text here. Reference Section X on page Y...", "anchors": ["verbatim phrase 1", "verbatim phrase 2"], "target_page": 5, "context_padding": 40 }, { "heading": "2. Another Section", "analysis": "More analysis...", "anchors": ["exact quote from source"], "target_pages": [10, 11], "context_padding": 50 } ]'
Section object fields:
heading (required): Section heading in the output documentanalysis (required): Your analysis textanchors (required): List of verbatim phrases from the source to search for and highlighttarget_page (optional): Single page number (1-indexed) to search ontarget_pages (optional): List of page numbers to search across (screenshots stitched vertically)context_padding (optional): Padding in PDF points above/below the anchor region (default: 40). Increase for more context.Save the output to the user's Desktop. Tell the user the filename and that they can open it to verify each claim against the highlighted source screenshots.
Before saving the final document, mentally verify:
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-13 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +77 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.