Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →This skill should be used when the user asks for a "GPT second opinion", wants a "cross-model review", needs to "check a plan before committing", wants another view after repeated failures, or explicitly invokes "codex-advisor".
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 46% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -31% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -55% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -55% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -71% | 0% |
Get a focused second opinion from GPT through the Codex CLI, without handing the work over to it.
codex-advisor agent. It receives therecent conversation automatically, so do not paste the history yourself.
reaches standard input:
node scripts/ask_codex.mjs <<'REVIEW' the review request REVIEW
State the decision, the evidence behind it, and any constraint that changes the verdict. Name the paths that matter: the reviewer has read-only access and checks load-bearing claims itself.
Return the answer without rewriting it. If codex is missing or unauthenticated, surface the error and ask the user to install it or sign in. Never review in its place.
Pinned to gpt-5.6-sol at medium reasoning effort. Inside Codex that may be the model already doing the work, so set CODEX_ADVISOR_MODEL to a different one.
Give the verdict serious weight. If a step it recommends fails when tried, or a file contradicts a specific claim, surface the conflict instead of following the review blindly.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.