Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →fcakyon/review-pr
This skill should be used when user asks to "review a PR", "review pull request", "review this pr", "code review this PR", "check PR
Passed 12 of 20 test cases with the skill, and 8 of 20 without it.
and 1 more in the full report
4 fixed9 passed either way9 still failing0 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 4 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
Review pull request #77 on acme/parser. After inspecting all changed files, you find zero bugs, zero security risks, zero breaking changes, and full test coverage. What exact text summary must be returned?
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| Returns exact text APPROVE - No fixes required. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
Review a pull request for bugs, regressions, missing tests, and risky changes.
When explicitly invoked with extra text, treat that text as the PR number or URL. If no PR reference is provided, infer it from the current branch.
Preferred execution
github-dev:pr-reviewer and pass the PR reference.Parse PR reference
gh pr view --json number,headRefName.Fetch PR data
gh pr diff <number> for the full diff.gh pr view <number> --json files for the changed file list..lock, .min.js, .min.css, dist/, build/, vendor/, node_modules/, _pb2.py, and images.Review focus
Review comment rules
gh for GitHub operations.If issues are found, report them in descending severity with file references and a final
recommendation of NEEDS_CHANGES.
test cases passed, vs 8 / 20 without
Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.