Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Deep web research for VCO: multi-hop search+browse+extract with an auditable action trace and a structured report (WebThinker-style).
.claude/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel-webthinker-deep-research/SKILL.md| Model | Eval pass | Runs |
|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | 100% | 11 |
| gemini-3.1-pro-preview | 100% | 2 |
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 6% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 86% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 3% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 1% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -29% | 0% |
Use this skill when the task requires deep web research (not just one-shot search), for example:
research-lookup.playwright or turix-cua overlays.Produce a folder with:
report.md — structured report (problem → findings → implications → next steps)sources.json — all sources (URL/title/access time/snippet)trace.jsonl — append-only action trace (search/open/extract/decision)notes.md — working notes with per-source anchorsUse scripts/init_webthinker_run.py to scaffold the folder.
This VCO skill supports a stable Lite mode by default, and keeps the upstream WebThinker repo vendored for optional advanced use.
C:\Users\羽裳\.codex\_external\ruc-nlpir\WebThinker\C:\Users\羽裳\.codex\skills\vibe\config\ruc-nlpir-runtime.jsonpwsh C:\Users\羽裳\.codex\skills\vibe\scripts\ruc-nlpir\preflight.ps1install-upstreams.ps1 auto-install path has been removed on purpose.LLM endpoint conventions (recommended):
OPENAI_BASE_URL (or runtime default)OPENAI_API_KEY (env var only; never write into files or CLI args)Use existing tools (no heavy model hosting):
python C:\Users\羽裳\.codex\skills\webthinker-deep-research\scripts\init_webthinker_run.py --topic "…" --out outputs/webthinkerweb.run search queries or mcp__tavily__tavily_search if available.web.run open/click/find for structured pagesplaywright when pages require dynamic rendering / interactionsnotes.md and sources.json continuouslyreport.md as you go (think-search-and-draft), not only at the endOnly choose this if you want to run the upstream system end-to-end and you have the environment:
torch, transformers, vllm) + a served reasoning modelThis mode is for high-throughput deep research runs; for most VCO tasks, Lite mode is enough and cheaper.
Each line is one JSON object, e.g.:
{"ts":"…","type":"search","query":"…","provider":"web.run"}{"ts":"…","type":"open","url":"…"}{"ts":"…","type":"extract","url":"…","highlights":["…","…"]}{"ts":"…","type":"decision","reason":"why this source matters","next":"…"}report.md links back to at least one entry in sources.json.sources.json contains the exact URLs you used (no “I saw somewhere…”).| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-10 | fail→pass | 14,521 | 8,617 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,509 | 2,662 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 12,518 | 5,042 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,256 | 1,344 | -40% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | pass→pass | 12,075 | 3,910 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,184 | 1,661 | -24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 8,903 | 14,964 | +68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,573 | 2,927 | +86% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | 7,110 | 6,240 | -12% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 564 | 1,481 | +163% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→fail | 33,184 | 4,633 | -86% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,233 | 1,474 | -76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→fail | 33,982 | 12,368 | -64% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 6,224 | 1,840 | -70% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 9,030 | 2,754 | -70% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,561 | 1,607 | +3% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 11,111 | 3,649 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,725 | 1,736 | +1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | 14,208 | 4,043 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,573 | 1,835 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | pass→pass | 15,306 | 5,764 | -62% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,012 | 2,007 | -33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 4,928 | 2,778 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 854 | 1,563 | +83% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 7,610 | 3,752 | -51% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,166 | 1,680 | +44% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 5,766 | 3,221 | -44% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,053 | 1,717 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 26,183 | 3,231 | -88% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 988 | 1,613 | +63% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | pass→pass | 16,213 | 9,579 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,507 | 2,790 | +11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | 19,617 | 16,338 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,057 | 3,783 | +24% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | fail→pass | 9,702 | 3,198 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,654 | 1,639 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 18,135 | 12,377 | -32% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,947 | 3,398 | +15% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | pass→pass | 18,959 | 6,532 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,174 | 2,259 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 18,161 | 9,303 | -49% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,061 | 2,553 | -17% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | fail→pass | 12,704 | 6,963 | -45% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,077 | 2,237 | +8% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted, and 17 counted toward the lift figure. The other 5 produced results that are not comparable between the two arms, so they are excluded from the headline rather than averaged into it. The headline lift of +55 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 17 comparable cases. 1 case got worse with the skill loaded, and it is included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.