Ready to supercharge your AI agents?

Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.

Code Review Reception · freedomintelligence | DecimalAI

code reviewby freedomintelligence

Code Review Reception

freedomintelligence/receiving-code-review

Source FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills ↗License Not recorded

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

SkillScore91Maintained

Automatic

Coding pack

Last verified 8/2/2026

What it changes

Passed 20 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 11 of 22 without it.

Without skill50%

With skill91%

Checks it passed that the model alone missed

Omits performative praise in the draft response
Omits gratitude expressions in the drafted response
Omits any variation of thanks or gratitude expressions

and 11 more in the full report

9 fixed11 passed either way2 still failing0 broke

Pass-rate lift: +41 pp
Tokens: +58%
Agent turns: 0%
Response time: -52%

Model gemini-3.6-flashMeasured 8/2/2026v120 of 22 cases passed with skill

Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.

Use this skill

Save it into your project's skills folder. Claude Code picks it up in its next session.

curl -fsSL --create-dirs -o .claude/skills/freedomintelligence-receiving-code-review/SKILL.md https://app.decimal.ai/s/freedomintelligence-receiving-code-review/SKILL.md

Want it pinned and updatable? pip install "decimalai>=0.15", then decimalai skills add freedomintelligence-receiving-code-review, and start Claude Code with claude --plugin-dir "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.agents"

1 · One-time — install the CLI (docs ↗)

pip install "decimalai>=0.15"

2 · Get the skill — writes .agents/skills/freedomintelligence-receiving-code-review/ and pins it in .decimal/skills.lock

decimalai skills add freedomintelligence-receiving-code-review

No CLI? Get the same file — curl · raw file

curl -fsSL --create-dirs -o .claude/skills/freedomintelligence-receiving-code-review/SKILL.md https://app.decimal.ai/s/freedomintelligence-receiving-code-review/SKILL.md

Raw file: /s/freedomintelligence-receiving-code-review/SKILL.md ↗ · machine-readable summary at /s/freedomintelligence-receiving-code-review.json ↗

Safety checks: 3 of 3 passed

Code scan CleanIntent PassedContent Clean

See it in action

One of 9 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.

1 of 9

Prompt

A reviewer commented on PR #42 recommending that I rename `usr_id` to `user_id` in `auth_service.py`. I want to write back: 'Great point! You're absolutely right! I'll update that right away!' Please generate a clean response to post on GitHub.

What was checked, without and with the skill
Checked	Without skill	With skill
Excludes performative praise phrases such as Great point	Missed	Passed
States the technical fix concisely without gratitude expressions	Missed	Passed

case-05 · gemini-3.6-flash · 8/2/2026 · answers are capped and redacted

What's inside

The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.

SKILL.md208 linessingle file

Code Review Reception

Overview

Code review requires technical evaluation, not emotional performance.

Core principle: Verify before implementing. Ask before assuming. Technical correctness over social comfort.

The Response Pattern

WHEN receiving code review feedback:

1. READ: Complete feedback without reacting
2. UNDERSTAND: Restate requirement in own words (or ask)
3. VERIFY: Check against codebase reality
4. EVALUATE: Technically sound for THIS codebase?
5. RESPOND: Technical acknowledgment or reasoned pushback
6. IMPLEMENT: One item at a time, test each

Forbidden Responses

NEVER:

"You're absolutely right!" (explicit CLAUDE.md violation)
"Great point!" / "Excellent feedback!" (performative)
"Let me implement that now" (before verification)

INSTEAD:

Restate the technical requirement
Ask clarifying questions
Push back with technical reasoning if wrong
Just start working (actions > words)

Handling Unclear Feedback

IF any item is unclear:
  STOP - do not implement anything yet
  ASK for clarification on unclear items

Track record

Benchmark

20 / 22

test cases passed, vs 11 / 22 without

Adoption

Users: 0
Times used: 0

Safety and source details

SkillSafety

✓ 3 of 3 passed

Code scan15 of 15 checks clean

0 critical · 0 warning · 0 info — scanner v4 — 8/1/2026

View 15 scanner checks

live_secretremote_code_executionreverse_shelldata_exfiltrationssrf_metadataagent_snoopinganti_refusaldestructive_commandsobfuscated_unicodeunicode_homoglyphopaque_blobsuspicious_urltool_overreachtrigger_abuseprompt_injection_phrasing

IntentSafe

LLM judge · does the skill do what it claims

ContentClean

LLM judge · policy & harmful-content review

Source

Imported

FreedomIntelligence / OpenClaw-Medical-Skills

skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md

View on GitHub ↗

Imported 8/1/2026Version v1

Other skills for the same job

Published skills whose descriptions closely match this one, with their headline benchmark lift.

More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.

Ready to supercharge your AI agents?

See it in action

What's inside

Code Review Reception

Overview

The Response Pattern

Forbidden Responses

Handling Unclear Feedback

Track record

Benchmark

Adoption

SkillSafety

Source

Other skills for the same job

Related skills