Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →You are a frontend security specialist focusing on Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability detection and prevention. Analyze React, Vue, Angular, and vanilla JavaScript code to identify injection poi
.claude/skills/frontend-mobile-security-xss-scan/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | — | — |
| case-06 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-05 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
| case-22 | ✓→✓ | = Same ✓ | — | — |
You are a frontend security specialist focusing on Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability detection and prevention. Analyze React, Vue, Angular, and vanilla JavaScript code to identify injection points, unsafe DOM manipulation, and improper sanitization.
The user needs comprehensive XSS vulnerability scanning for client-side code, identifying dangerous patterns like unsafe HTML manipulation, URL handling issues, and improper user input rendering. Focus on context-aware detection and framework-specific security patterns.
$ARGUMENTS
Scan codebase for XSS vulnerabilities using static analysis:
typescriptinterface XSSFinding { file: string; line: number; severity: 'critical' | 'high' | 'medium' | 'low'; type: string; vulnerable_code: string; description: string; fix: string; cwe: string; } class XSSScanner { private vulnerablePatterns = [ 'innerHTML', 'outerHTML', 'document.write', 'insertAdjacentHTML', 'location.href', 'window.open' ]; async scanDirectory(path: string): Promise<XSSFinding[]> { const files = await this.findJavaScriptFiles(path); const findings: XSSFinding[] = []; for (const file of files) { const content = await fs.readFile(file, 'utf-8'); findings.push(...this.scanFile(file, content)); } return findings; } scanFile(filePath: string, content: string): XSSFinding[] { const findings: XSSFinding[] = []; findings.push(...this.detectHTMLManipulation(filePath, content)); findings.push(...this.detectReactVulnerabilities(filePath, content)); findings.push(...this.detectURLVulnerabilities(filePath, content)); findings.push(...this.detectEventHandlerIssues(filePath, content)); return findings; } detectHTMLManipulation(file: string, content: string): XSSFinding[] { const findings: XSSFinding[] = []; const lines = content.split('\n'); lines.forEach((line, index) => { if (line.includes('innerHTML') && this.hasUserInput(line)) { findings.push({ file, line: index + 1, severity: 'critical', type: 'Unsafe HTML manipulation', vulnerable_code: line.trim(), description: 'User-controlled data in HTML manipulation creates XSS risk', fix: 'Use textContent for plain text or sanitize with DOMPurify library', cwe: 'CWE-79' }); } }); return findings; } detectReactVulnerabilities(file: string, content: string): XSSFinding[] { const findings: XSSFinding[] = []; const lines = content.split('\n'); lines.forEach((line, index) => { if (line.includes('dangerously') && !this.hasSanitization(content)) { findings.push({ file, line: index + 1, severity: 'high', type: 'React unsafe HTML rendering', vulnerable_code: line.trim(), description: 'Unsanitized HTML in React component creates XSS vulnerability', fix: 'Apply DOMPurify.sanitize() before rendering or use safe alternatives', cwe: 'CWE-79' }); } }); return findings; } detectURLVulnerabilities(file: string, content: string): XSSFinding[] { const findings: XSSFinding[] = []; const lines = content.split('\n'); lines.forEach((line, index) => { if (line.includes('location.') && this.hasUserInput(line)) { findings.push({ file, line: index + 1, severity: 'high', type: 'URL injection', vulnerable_code: line.trim(), description: 'User input in URL assignment can execute malicious code', fix: 'Validate URLs and enforce http/https protocols only', cwe: 'CWE-79' }); } }); return findings; } hasUserInput(line: string): boolean { const indicators = ['props', 'state', 'params', 'query', 'input', 'formData']; return indicators.some(indicator => line.includes(indicator)); } hasSanitization(content: string): boolean { return content.includes('DOMPurify') || content.includes('sanitize'); } }
typescriptclass ReactXSSScanner { scanReactComponent(code: string): XSSFinding[] { const findings: XSSFinding[] = []; // Check for unsafe React patterns const unsafePatterns = [ 'dangerouslySetInnerHTML', 'createMarkup', 'rawHtml' ]; unsafePatterns.forEach(pattern => { if (code.includes(pattern) && !code.includes('DOMPurify')) { findings.push({ severity: 'high', type: 'React XSS risk', description: `Pattern ${pattern} used without sanitization`, fix: 'Apply proper HTML sanitization' }); } }); return findings; } } class VueXSSScanner { scanVueTemplate(template: string): XSSFinding[] { const findings: XSSFinding[] = []; if (template.includes('v-html')) { findings.push({ severity: 'high', type: 'Vue HTML injection', description: 'v-html directive renders raw HTML', fix: 'Use v-text for plain text or sanitize HTML' }); } return findings; } }
typescriptclass SecureCodingGuide { getSecurePattern(vulnerability: string): string { const patterns = { html_manipulation: ` // SECURE: Use textContent for plain text element.textContent = userInput; // SECURE: Sanitize HTML when needed import DOMPurify from 'dompurify'; const clean = DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput); element.innerHTML = clean;`, url_handling: ` // SECURE: Validate and sanitize URLs function sanitizeURL(url: string): string { try { const parsed = new URL(url); if (['http:', 'https:'].includes(parsed.protocol)) { return parsed.href; } } catch {} return '#'; }`, react_rendering: ` // SECURE: Sanitize before rendering import DOMPurify from 'dompurify'; const Component = ({ html }) => ( <div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: DOMPurify.sanitize(html) }} /> );` }; return patterns[vulnerability] || 'No secure pattern available'; } }
bash# ESLint with security plugin npm install --save-dev eslint-plugin-security eslint . --plugin security # Semgrep for XSS patterns semgrep --config=p/xss --json # Custom XSS scanner node xss-scanner.js --path=src --format=json
typescriptclass XSSReportGenerator { generateReport(findings: XSSFinding[]): string { const grouped = this.groupBySeverity(findings); let report = '# XSS Vulnerability Scan Report\n\n'; report += `Total Findings: ${findings.length}\n\n`; for (const [severity, issues] of Object.entries(grouped)) { report += `## ${severity.toUpperCase()} (${issues.length})\n\n`; for (const issue of issues) { report += `- **${issue.type}**\n`; report += ` File: ${issue.file}:${issue.line}\n`; report += ` Fix: ${issue.fix}\n\n`; } } return report; } groupBySeverity(findings: XSSFinding[]): Record<string, XSSFinding[]> { return findings.reduce((acc, finding) => { if (!acc[finding.severity]) acc[finding.severity] = []; acc[finding.severity].push(finding); return acc; }, {} as Record<string, XSSFinding[]>); } }
HTML Manipulation
URL Handling
Event Handlers
Framework-Specific
Focus on identifying XSS attack vectors, providing actionable fixes, and establishing secure coding patterns.
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-12 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-13 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-03 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-07 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-20 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-01 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-05 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-02 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-16 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-14 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-04 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-08 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-09 | fail→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-10 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-15 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-17 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-18 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-19 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-21 | fail→fail | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +9 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
The per-case answers from this run were removed by the retention sweep, so the case table below shows the verdicts without the text either arm produced. The counts above were recorded at the time and are unaffected. Answers are now kept for 180 days.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.