Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Use when a task is multi-step, may span context resets or sessions, uses subagents, or risks losing state before completion.
| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 162% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 218% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 214% | 0% |
| case-10 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 158% | 0% |
| case-11 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 49% | 0% |
Use this skill to keep long tasks checkpointed, resumable, drift-aware, and evidence-gated.
This is a protocol skill. It does not execute plans, dispatch subagents, run tests, or grant completion authority.
Current owner:
Not owned here:
GateDecisionUse this skill when any of these are true:
For short direct answers or one-command checks, do not force this protocol.
Multi-step, todo-driven, or subagent-using tasks do not force durable records by themselves; keep an inline checkpoint unless the task also crosses sessions, needs handoff, or requires resumable state.
Maintain artifacts under docs/aegis/work/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>/:
| Artifact | File | When | |----------|------|------| | TaskIntentDraft | 10-intent.md and optional task-intent-draft.json | Start protocol | | BaselineReadSetHint | 10-intent.md (inline) | Start protocol | | BaselineUsageDraft | 10-intent.md (inline) and optional baseline-usage-draft.json | Start protocol and when baseline usage changes | | ImpactStatementDraft | 10-intent.md (inline) | Start protocol | | TodoCheckpointDraft | 20-checkpoint.md and optional todo-checkpoint-draft.json | Each checkpoint | | ResumeStateHint | 20-checkpoint.md (inline) | Each pause/handoff | | DriftCheckDraft | 20-checkpoint.md (inline) and optional drift-check-draft.json | Per-slice protocol | | EvidenceBundleDraft | 90-evidence.md and optional evidence-bundle-draft.json | Per-slice protocol | | Reflection | 99-reflection.md | Completion candidate |
For medium+ complexity tasks only. Low-complexity tasks skip work/.
Execution Readiness View may be included inline in 10-intent.md or the active checkpoint when the workstream is medium/high, subagent-driven, handoff-prone, long-running, architecture / contract sensitive, or compatibility / retirement sensitive. It is a human-readable rendering of existing drafts and the parent plan, not a new JSON artifact type and not completion authority.
Planless Slice Lane:
workstream and the current micro-slice only executes or refines one bounded parent task.
text Slice Card:
Goal anchors slice-level completeness only.verification-before-completion Goal Closureagainst the parent plan/spec and any active goal frame, rendered through the unified Aegis impact/safety receipt unless audit detail is requested.
parent plan, existing compatibility boundary, and known verification path.
state is needed.
architecture boundary, migration, persistence, security/permission, distribution/release surface, or unclear verification boundary appears.
When durable architecture decisions are in scope, these work records are the preferred ADR Auto Backfill source. Preserve ADR signals, source refs, alternatives, compatibility boundaries, drift checks, retirement notes, and baseline-sync questions in the work record instead of relying on memory at completion time.
These are draft / hint / projection inputs. They are not authoritative runtime records.
When configured Aegis workspace support or installed Aegis workspace support is available, use it for the target project workspace and lifecycle records:
bash python <aegis-workspace-helper> init --root <target-project-root>
creation over hand-created files:
bash python <aegis-workspace-helper> new-work --root <target-project-root> --date YYYY-MM-DD --slug <slug> --title "<title>" --requested-outcome "<outcome>" --scope "<scope>" --change-kind <kind>
bash python <aegis-workspace-helper> add-checkpoint --root <target-project-root> --work YYYY-MM-DD-<slug> ... python <aegis-workspace-helper> add-baseline-usage --root <target-project-root> --work YYYY-MM-DD-<slug> ... python <aegis-workspace-helper> add-evidence --root <target-project-root> --work YYYY-MM-DD-<slug> ... python <aegis-workspace-helper> add-drift-check --root <target-project-root> --work YYYY-MM-DD-<slug> ...
bundle and check the workspace:
bash python <aegis-workspace-helper> bundle --root <target-project-root> --work YYYY-MM-DD-<slug> python <aegis-workspace-helper> check --root <target-project-root>
These helper checks validate workspace structure, index coverage, and JSON sidecar shape only. They do not determine evidence sufficiency, do not produce authoritative GateDecision, and do not grant completion authority.
Before long-task execution:
non-goals. Stop condition must allow done, blocked, needs-verification, and scope-exceeded outcomes.
an Execution Readiness View:
needs-baseline-readback.aegis-workspace.py new-work tocreate/index the first docs/aegis/work/ files and run check --root <target-project-root> before continuing.
Before each work slice, restate:
Execution Readiness View alignment when one existsFor micro-slices under an existing parent plan, use the Planless Slice Lane and state the Slice Card instead of opening a new planning/specification artifact.
After each work slice, update:
aegis-workspace.py add-checkpoint,aegis-workspace.py add-baseline-usage, aegis-workspace.py add-evidence, and aegis-workspace.py add-drift-check when available
When patch-shape/ripple triage, an H-class finding, or a bounded compatibility mitigation fired, a locally green result does not clear that direction. Reuse checkpoint prose and evidence refs to retain PatchShape, CanonicalOwner, UpwardDrillSignal, decision, latest outcome, and one bounded evidence ref; do not copy raw logs or full diffs.
If no fresh evidence exists, the state is needs-verification or partial.
When resuming:
CONTEXT.md language for non-trivial work.Execution Readiness View if present.retirement, test, and review locks.
establishing-project-context for semantic conflict; otherwise pause or return to planning.
and causal topology and route comparison to systematic-debugging; a new carrier name alone does not prove a new direction.
Never resume from memory alone.
Answer these after each slice:
Execution Readiness View exists, does the active slice still matchits intent lock, scope fence, baseline lock, compatibility boundary, retirement boundary, test obligations, and review gates?
Allowed decisions:
continuepause-for-userneeds-baseline-readbackneeds-verificationblockedForbidden decisions:
gate-passedcompletion-grantedauthoritatively-safeBefore saying work is complete:
--work YYYY-MM-DD-<slug> if the helper is available and a work record exists.
python <aegis-workspace-helper> check --root <target-project-root>if the helper is available and the task wrote docs/aegis/ records.
GateInputPack as future-runtime input only.proof bundle, drift checks, evidence refs, and ADR signals into aegis:verification-before-completion for ADR Backfill Check.
Method Pack output is verified evidence and advisory judgment only. It is not authoritative completion.
Use this shape for long-task updates:
Aegis Visibility: why checkpoint, resume, drift, handoff, or parent-plandiscipline is shaping the next step
TodoCheckpointDraft: current todo, completed todos, active slice, next stepBaselineUsageDraft: required refs, acknowledged refs, cited refs, missing refs, decisionExecution Readiness View: present | absent | refreshed | stale, and thealignment signal when present
Evidence: commands, files, logs, or manual checksDriftCheckDraft: scope, compatibility, retirement, decisionRisk / Unknown: unresolved blockers or missing evidenceNext: the next smallest safe actionOther measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.