Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Add an AI agent / RAG backend (@convex-dev/agent) to the Convex app.
.claude/skills/get-convex-convex-agent/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-01 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -34% | 0% |
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -1% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -13% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -61% | 0% |
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -48% | 0% |
<!-- GENERATED from convex-agents content/capabilities/agent.json — do not edit by hand. -->
Install @convex-dev/agent for durable threads, message history, tool-calls, and vector search/RAG — the backend for an in-app AI agent. Call models through the Convex AI Gateway by default: Convex holds the provider credentials, so there is no LLM key to obtain, store, or rotate.
languageModel: convexGateway("provider/model") — no API key needed (needs convex 1.45+ on a Convex Cloud deployment, paid plan).env micro power.env micro power.convexGateway from @convex-dev/ai-sdk-provider) for model calls; fall back to a provider key in Convex env only where the gateway is unavailable (free plan, self-hosted, local backend).env micro power.| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-01 | fail→pass | 24,087 | 15,837 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 4,157 | 2,728 | -34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 22,076 | 19,942 | -10% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,538 | 3,496 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 20,437 | 16,026 | -22% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,124 | 2,718 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | pass→pass | 13,248 | 8,751 | -34% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,608 | 1,141 | -29% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 19,590 | 8,378 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,685 | 1,047 | -61% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | fail→pass | 16,408 | 8,210 | -50% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,880 | 977 | -48% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | pass→fail | 20,750 | 14,979 | -28% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,936 | 2,473 | -16% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | pass→pass | 17,651 | 9,533 | -46% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,416 | 1,287 | -47% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 11,282 | 8,933 | -21% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,185 | 1,034 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 17,884 | 10,515 | -41% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,251 | 1,499 | -33% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→pass | 16,005 | 12,343 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,975 | 1,762 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | fail→pass | 9,236 | 3,979 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,826 | 1,208 | -34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | pass→pass | 20,408 | 12,684 | -38% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,133 | 3,001 | -4% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 11,710 | 8,641 | -26% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,162 | 1,072 | -8% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | fail→pass | 16,836 | 7,465 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,015 | 1,986 | -1% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 18,276 | 7,053 | -61% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,416 | 1,746 | -28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | fail→pass | 21,020 | 8,954 | -57% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,128 | 2,145 | -31% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 16,864 | 16,198 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,816 | 2,305 | -18% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | pass→fail | 8,458 | 7,371 | -13% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 621 | 779 | +25% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-20 | fail→pass | 24,626 | 12,912 | -48% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,242 | 2,052 | -37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 13,459 | 12,950 | -4% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,538 | 1,632 | +6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 21,523 | 15,729 | -27% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,339 | 2,619 | -22% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +50 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases. 2 cases got worse with the skill loaded, and they are included in that figure.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
| Model | Method | Date | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemini-3.6-flash | verified | 8/28/2026 | +17% |
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.