Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Infer JSON structure and types with jq-based schema discovery.
.claude/skills/github-jqschema/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-02 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -76% | 0% |
| case-03 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -49% | 0% |
| case-04 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -58% | 0% |
| case-05 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -79% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | -37% | 0% |
Use ./.github/skills/jqschema/jqschema.sh to generate a compact structural schema (keys + types) from JSON input. Pipe any JSON source through it to discover structure before querying full data.
bash# Analyze a file or command output cat data.json | ./.github/skills/jqschema/jqschema.sh gh api search/repositories?q=language:go | ./.github/skills/jqschema/jqschema.sh
The script replaces object values with type names ("string", "number", "boolean", "null"), reduces arrays to first-element structure, and outputs compact JSON. Use perPage: 1 to fetch minimal data when exploring unknown API shapes.
Example: {"total_count":1000,"items":[{"login":"user1","id":123}]} → {"total_count":"number","items":[{"login":"string","id":"number"}]}
| Case | Status | Duration (ms) | Turns | Tokens | Tool calls | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | Without | With | Δ | ||
case-20 | pass→pass | 13,361 | 10,245 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,485 | 2,153 | -13% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-01 | fail→fail | 9,973 | 1,784 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,942 | 502 | -74% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-02 | fail→pass | 11,141 | 2,564 | -77% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,256 | 548 | -76% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-03 | fail→pass | 11,288 | 4,628 | -59% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,917 | 975 | -49% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-04 | fail→pass | 15,495 | 5,214 | -66% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,693 | 1,129 | -58% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-05 | fail→pass | 15,122 | 2,228 | -85% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,443 | 524 | -79% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-06 | pass→pass | 5,074 | 3,272 | -36% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 805 | 754 | -6% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-07 | fail→pass | 6,750 | 2,828 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,043 | 661 | -37% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-08 | fail→pass | 13,595 | 3,042 | -78% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,330 | 735 | -68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-09 | pass→pass | 6,436 | 2,828 | -56% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,027 | 676 | -34% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-10 | fail→pass | 14,882 | 2,624 | -82% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,187 | 555 | -53% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-11 | fail→fail | 11,080 | 3,095 | -72% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,091 | 799 | -62% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-12 | pass→pass | 10,695 | 2,618 | -76% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,760 | 591 | -66% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-13 | fail→pass | 12,750 | 4,113 | -68% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,126 | 1,030 | -52% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-14 | fail→pass | 8,948 | 2,997 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,969 | 636 | -68% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-15 | pass→pass | 10,266 | 7,947 | -23% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,602 | 1,596 | -0% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-16 | fail→pass | 17,098 | 6,778 | -60% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 2,591 | 1,436 | -45% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-17 | pass→pass | 5,737 | 2,431 | -58% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 933 | 630 | -32% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-18 | pass→pass | 5,749 | 3,036 | -47% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 954 | 690 | -28% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-19 | fail→pass | 10,845 | 3,577 | -67% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,665 | 668 | -60% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-21 | pass→pass | 6,350 | 5,289 | -17% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1,214 | 1,078 | -11% | 0 | 0 | — |
case-22 | pass→pass | 15,659 | 13,153 | -16% | 1 | 1 | 0% | 3,921 | 3,164 | -19% | 0 | 0 | — |
DecimalAI ran this skill against gemini-3.6-flash twice over the same eval suite — once with the skill loaded and once without — and compared the two runs case by case. 22 cases were attempted. The headline lift of +50 percentage points is the difference between those two pass rates over the 22 comparable cases.
Without the skill loaded, the model failed this case. With it loaded, the same prompt on the same model passed. This is one improved case from the latest verified run; every case, including any that regressed, is in the table above.
Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.