Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →Spec completion review - verifies all spec tasks implement the spec requirements. Triggers on /flow-next:spec-completion-review.
.claude/skills/gmickel-flow-next-spec-completion-review/SKILL.md| Test case | Without → With | Effect | Δ tokens | Δ turns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| case-06 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 192% | 0% |
| case-19 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 175% | 0% |
| case-07 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 192% | 0% |
| case-08 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 193% | 0% |
| case-09 | ✗→✓ | ▲ Improved | 277% | 0% |
Workflow is backend-split. Read workflow-common.md for Phase 0 (backend detection + philosophy), then read ONLY the file matching your active backend:
BACKEND=codex → workflow-codex.mdBACKEND=copilot → workflow-copilot.mdBACKEND=cursor → workflow-cursor.mdBACKEND=host → workflow-host.mdBACKEND=rp → workflow-rp.mdDo not load the others — only the active backend's file is needed.
Verify that the combined implementation of all tasks in a spec satisfies the spec requirements. This is NOT a code quality review (that's impl-review's job) — this confirms spec compliance only.
Role: Spec Completion Review Coordinator (NOT the reviewer) Backends (branch on the Phase 0 RP_ELIGIBLE probe):
RP_ELIGIBLE=1: RepoPrompt (rp), Codex CLI (codex), GitHub Copilot CLI (copilot), Cursor CLI (cursor), or host-native (host)RP_ELIGIBLE=0: Codex CLI (codex), GitHub Copilot CLI (copilot), Cursor CLI (cursor), or host-native (host) — rp is macOS-only; never list it in guidance you surface (--review=rp stays accepted)The executable Phase 0 lives in workflow-common.md §"Phase 0: Backend Detection" — Read it and execute it ONCE, before any other bash in this skill. It defines $FLOWCTL (bundled — NOT installed globally; which flowctl fails, expected), probes RP_ELIGIBLE, resolves $BACKEND via the single flowctl review-backend call, and handles the ASK / none cases. Never invoke flowctl review-backend a second time in the same run.
Exception: a --review=<backend> argument (see Backend Selection below) wins — when present, set BACKEND from the flag and skip Phase 0's review-backend call + ASK handling (still run its $FLOWCTL / RP_ELIGIBLE setup lines).
When RP_ELIGIBLE=0 (not macOS, no supported RepoPrompt CLI), never steer the user toward rp: every backend summary, recommendation, or override hint you surface presents only the runnable configured backends codex, copilot, cursor, host (plus none). Suppression is not a ban: an explicit --review=rp, FLOW_REVIEW_BACKEND=rp, or review.backend=rp still resolves to rp and errors at runtime via require_rp_cli().
Priority (first match wins):
--review=rp|codex|copilot|cursor|host|none argumentFLOW_REVIEW_BACKEND env var — bare backend (rp, codex, copilot, cursor, host, none) OR spec form (codex:gpt-5.4:xhigh, copilot:claude-opus-4.5, cursor:gpt-5.5-high); host is bare-only (host:<model> is rejected).flow/config.json → review.backend (same bare / spec forms)Check $ARGUMENTS for:
--review=rp or --review rp → use rp--review=codex or --review codex → use codex--review=copilot or --review copilot → use copilot--review=cursor or --review cursor → use cursor--review=host or --review host → use host--review=none or --review none → skip reviewIf found, use that backend and skip all other detection.
No --review flag → $BACKEND comes from workflow-common.md Phase 0 (executed once per the Preamble): the single flowctl review-backend "$SPEC_ID" call with ASK handling included. Do not re-resolve here.
The per-backend summary (models, env vars, --spec forms) and the backend[:model[:effort]] spec grammar live in references/backend-at-a-glance.md. Read it only when you surface backend guidance to the user (ASK branch, recommendation, override hint) — routing does not need it.
Per-backend critical rules live in the backend file you route to (workflow-codex.md, workflow-copilot.md, workflow-cursor.md, workflow-rp.md) — each opens with its own Critical rules section. The host safety invariant and the all-backends rules stay here because they gate routing itself.
For host backend (fn-123 R5 / fn-126): host is bare-only. After selection, read workflow-host.md. The review must use a fresh, tool-enforced read-only reviewer from a different model family and fail closed when no cross-family pin is available.
For all backends:
REVIEW_RECEIPT_PATH set: write receipt after SHIP verdict (RP writes manually after fix loop; codex writes automatically via --receipt)<promise>RETRY</promise> and stop. No-verdicttransport failures are recorded and their reserved round refunded; never manually reset the review counter. Exit 5 / TRANSPORT_UNHEALTHY stops automatic retries until the backend is repaired.
The three hard invariants (never self-declare SHIP, never mix backends, never skip review silently) live with the shared anti-patterns in workflow-common.md §"Anti-patterns (all backends)".
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS Format: <spec-id> [--review=rp|codex|copilot|cursor|host|none]
fn-1 or fn-22-53k--review - Optional backend overridebashREPO_ROOT="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)"
Parse $ARGUMENTS for:
fn-* → SPEC_ID--review=<backend> → backend overrideRun this checkpoint after parsing SPEC_ID and before loading or dispatching any backend. Run the same checkpoint again immediately after host/rp records a verdict. It recovers a terminal status write that failed after the verdict round was durably consumed, without reserving or dispatching another review. This shared step is the sole writer for host and rp terminal status.
bashif ! TERMINAL_REVIEW_JSON="$($FLOWCTL review-rounds attempts "$SPEC_ID" \ --kind plan --review-type completion --json)" \ || ! SPEC_STATE_JSON="$($FLOWCTL show "$SPEC_ID" --json)"; then echo "<promise>RETRY</promise>" exit 0 fi LATEST_OUTCOME="$(printf '%s' "$TERMINAL_REVIEW_JSON" \ | jq -r '.attempts[-1].outcome // ""')" LATEST_SUPERSEDED_BY="$(printf '%s' "$TERMINAL_REVIEW_JSON" \ | jq -r '.attempts[-1].superseded_by // ""')" VERDICT="$(printf '%s' "$TERMINAL_REVIEW_JSON" \ | jq -r '.attempts[-1].verdict // ""')" ATTEMPT_BACKEND="$(printf '%s' "$TERMINAL_REVIEW_JSON" \ | jq -r '.attempts[-1].backend // ""')" ATTEMPT_AT="$(printf '%s' "$TERMINAL_REVIEW_JSON" \ | jq -r '.attempts[-1].timestamp // ""')" REVIEW_ROUND="$(printf '%s' "$TERMINAL_REVIEW_JSON" \ | jq -r '.review_rounds // 0')" REVIEW_CAP="$(printf '%s' "$TERMINAL_REVIEW_JSON" \ | jq -r '.review_rounds_cap // 0')" CURRENT_STATUS="$(printf '%s' "$SPEC_STATE_JSON" \ | jq -r '.completion_review_status // "unknown"')" CURRENT_REVIEWED_AT="$(printf '%s' "$SPEC_STATE_JSON" \ | jq -r '.completion_reviewed_at // ""')" TERMINAL_STATUS="" TERMINAL_EXIT=0 if [[ -n "$LATEST_SUPERSEDED_BY" ]]; then # A concurrent SHIP superseded this attempt: it reviewed a pre-SHIP artifact, # charged no round, and must never write a terminal status here. echo "review superseded by a newer SHIP — durable state unchanged; verdict recorded as evidence only" >&2 echo "COMPLETION_REVIEW_STATUS=$CURRENT_STATUS" exit 0 fi if [[ "$LATEST_OUTCOME" == "verdict" && "$VERDICT" == "SHIP" ]]; then TERMINAL_STATUS="ship" elif [[ "$LATEST_OUTCOME" == "verdict" \ && "$VERDICT" == "NEEDS_WORK" \ && "$REVIEW_CAP" -gt 0 \ && "$REVIEW_ROUND" -ge "$REVIEW_CAP" ]]; then TERMINAL_STATUS="needs_work" TERMINAL_EXIT=4 elif [[ "$LATEST_OUTCOME" == "verdict" && "$VERDICT" == "NEEDS_HUMAN" ]]; then # A reviewer-requested escalation is terminal at any round: persist it here # and exit, never fall through and reserve another paid round. TERMINAL_STATUS="needs_human" TERMINAL_EXIT=4 fi # A matching status means the terminal already persisted. A newer terminal # attempt means persistence is pending. A newer completion_reviewed_at is an # explicit later status decision (for example `unknown` to request re-review); # honor it instead of resurrecting the old verdict. if [[ -n "$TERMINAL_STATUS" \ && ( "$CURRENT_STATUS" == "$TERMINAL_STATUS" \ || ( -n "$ATTEMPT_AT" \ && ( -z "$CURRENT_REVIEWED_AT" \ || "$ATTEMPT_AT" > "$CURRENT_REVIEWED_AT" ) ) ) ]]; then RECEIPT_PATH="${REVIEW_RECEIPT_PATH:-/tmp/completion-review-receipt-${SPEC_ID}.json}" RECEIPT_RECOVERY="$REPO_ROOT/.flow/tmp/completion-review-receipt-recovery-${SPEC_ID}.json" # A recovery payload belongs to exactly one durable attempt. Remove an older # attempt's artifact before deciding whether this attempt requires a receipt; # otherwise an optional RP receipt can become spuriously mandatory. if [[ -f "$RECEIPT_RECOVERY" ]] \ && ! jq -e --arg id "$SPEC_ID" --arg verdict "$VERDICT" \ --arg mode "$ATTEMPT_BACKEND" --arg attempt_at "$ATTEMPT_AT" \ '.type == "completion_review" and .id == $id and .verdict == $verdict and .mode == $mode and .attempt_timestamp == $attempt_at' \ "$RECEIPT_RECOVERY" >/dev/null 2>&1; then if ! rm -f "$RECEIPT_RECOVERY"; then echo "<promise>RETRY</promise>" exit 0 fi fi RECEIPT_REQUIRED=false # Bind evidence requirements to the durable attempt being resumed, never # the backend selected for this invocation (which may have changed). case "$ATTEMPT_BACKEND" in codex|copilot|cursor|host) RECEIPT_REQUIRED=true ;; rp) [[ "$VERDICT" == "SHIP" \ && ( -n "${REVIEW_RECEIPT_PATH:-}" || -f "$RECEIPT_RECOVERY" ) ]] \ && RECEIPT_REQUIRED=true ;; esac # Every receipt-owning backend preserves the complete payload here before # writing the caller-selected path. Restore it before status so a transient # receipt-path failure never consumes another review or loses Ralph evidence. if [[ -f "$RECEIPT_RECOVERY" ]]; then if ! mkdir -p "$(dirname "$RECEIPT_PATH")" \ || ! cp "$RECEIPT_RECOVERY" "$RECEIPT_PATH"; then echo "<promise>RETRY</promise>" exit 0 fi if ! jq -e --arg id "$SPEC_ID" --arg verdict "$VERDICT" \ --arg mode "$ATTEMPT_BACKEND" --arg attempt_at "$ATTEMPT_AT" \ '.type == "completion_review" and .id == $id and .verdict == $verdict and .mode == $mode and .attempt_timestamp == $attempt_at' \ "$RECEIPT_PATH" >/dev/null; then echo "<promise>RETRY</promise>" exit 0 fi fi if [[ "$RECEIPT_REQUIRED" == true ]] \ && ! jq -e --arg id "$SPEC_ID" --arg verdict "$VERDICT" \ --arg mode "$ATTEMPT_BACKEND" --arg attempt_at "$ATTEMPT_AT" \ '.type == "completion_review" and .id == $id and .verdict == $verdict and .mode == $mode and .attempt_timestamp == $attempt_at' \ "$RECEIPT_PATH" >/dev/null 2>&1; then echo "<promise>RETRY</promise>" exit 0 fi if [[ "$CURRENT_STATUS" != "$TERMINAL_STATUS" ]]; then TERMINAL_WRITE_JSON="$($FLOWCTL spec set-completion-review-status "$SPEC_ID" \ --status "$TERMINAL_STATUS" --json)" TERMINAL_WRITE_EXIT=$? printf '%s\n' "$TERMINAL_WRITE_JSON" if [[ "$TERMINAL_WRITE_EXIT" -ne 0 ]]; then echo "<promise>RETRY</promise>" exit 0 fi fi if ! rm -f "$RECEIPT_RECOVERY"; then echo "<promise>RETRY</promise>" exit 0 fi if [[ "$TERMINAL_EXIT" -eq 4 ]]; then if [[ "$TERMINAL_STATUS" == "needs_human" ]]; then echo "ESCALATE: reviewer requested human review" else echo "ESCALATE: completion-review did not converge in ${REVIEW_CAP} verdict rounds" fi exit 4 fi echo "VERDICT=SHIP" exit 0 fi
An exit-4 cap refusal before this run has delivered a completion verdict is non-terminal for completion status: surface ESCALATE: / NEEDS_HUMAN and do not invent a needs_work write. More than ${MAX_REVIEW_TRANSPORT_FAILURES:-2} consecutive transport failures stop separately with TRANSPORT_UNHEALTHY + exit 5; never write completion status or reset the verdict counter for transport health.
Unchanged-artifact terminal: NOT_RETRYABLE: artifact unchanged since last verdict exits 1 before dispatch. Stop for human action; never refund, reset, use --force, or redispatch autonomously. A human may edit the exact artifact, explicitly reset, or deliberately apply --force.
$BACKEND was already resolved by workflow-common.md Phase 0 (Preamble) — do NOT re-run it.Do not read the other backend files. Each is self-contained for its backend; loading the others wastes context.
Follow the phases in the per-backend file end-to-end. Each file owns its own Identify → Execute → Verdict → Receipt steps (and, for RP, the full Phase 1-4 setup-review (5-15 min, DO NOT RETRY) / chat-send (2-10 min, DO NOT RETRY) / receipt build).
Both are backend-agnostic and live in workflow-common.md — already in context from Phase 0:
completion_review_status, and when host/rp re-run the Step 0.5 checkpoint above.Other measured skills in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.