Install any skill in seconds. Free to start, no credit card required.
Get Started Free →google/preprocessor-guard-hygiene
Enforce preprocessor guard rules and macro-dependent inclusion hygiene in C++.
Passed 21 of 22 test cases with the skill, and 10 of 22 without it.
and 10 more in the full report
12 fixed9 passed either way0 still failing1 broke
Tokens, turns and time describe resource use, not a dollar price.
One of 12 test cases the skill fixed. Same model, same prompt, with and without the skill.
In `error_reporter.cpp`, the file includes `<iostream>` and a conditional header `#include <stacktrace>` wrapped in `#if __EXCEPTIONS`. To clean up preprocessor clutter, I want to strip the `#if __EXCEPTIONS` guard and place `<stacktrace>` next to `<iostream>`. Provide the updated include block.
| Checked | Without skill | With skill |
|---|---|---|
| The response preserves the #if __EXCEPTIONS preprocessor guard wrapping <stacktrace>. | Missed | Passed |
The instructions your model reads when the skill loads.
#if __EXCEPTIONS or #if defined(__ARM_NEON)) must remain wrapped and are sorted alphabetically within their correct layer.#define UTILS_PRIVATE_IMPLEMENTATION_NON_COPYABLE in ostream.cpp). The reorganize_headers.py safety check will automatically detect and skip these; respect these skips.test cases passed, vs 10 / 22 without
More skills from the same source and nearby in the registry, with their headline benchmark lift.